The fallacious arguments are:
The Civil War was about Northern businessman trying to bankrupt Southern farmers by emancipating their enslaving work force.
England developed a fair and just taxation system for the American Colonies.
<em>Both sentences have fallacious arguments.
</em>
A fallacy is a wrong idea or a belief that is not true. In the case of the question, the first sentence is a fallacy because the Civil War was not about that argument. The Union wanted to have abolishment ideas that were not supported by the Confederated States. In the case of the second sentence, that is also a fallacy. The taxation system imposed by the English was not fair. It was a heavy taxation system that upset the colonies and that was one of the reasons to start the American Revolution.
The Proclamation applied in the ten states that were still in rebellion in 1863, and thus did not cover the nearly 500,000 slaves in the slave-holding border states (Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland or Delaware) that had not seceded. Those slaves were freed by later separate state and federal actions.
poopjnfhuiiu42iuhi's account has been compromised.
Answer:
The abolition varied in many ways, for it had to do with money, power, politics and even a political system. It had to do with revolutions, independence, and even wars.
Explanation:
The abolition varied in many ways, for it had to do with money, power, politics and even a political system.
In Western Hemisphere, in the Americas, in some countries, abolition came right away with independence, for instance in Haiti and the Caribbean some other South American Countries, but mostly the freedom for the slaves had to wait.
In Mexico, 9 years after their independence.
In the US only after the Civil War, there was full abolition in American soil.
Brazil was the last country to fully abolish slavery in his land in 1889, 76 years after his independence! Changing the regime, from monarchy to republic.
The idea of republic deeply influenced the process of abolition.
C) working together to move beyond some old racial wounds
