Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
C.recession is the right anssweer
The Atlantic slave trade or transatlantic slave trade, also called slave trade, occurred throughout the Atlantic Ocean between the 16th and 19th centuries.
Founded in the 1960s, Fairtrade certification represents an initiative that brings together social responsibility, sustainability and competitiveness for small and medium producers.
Fairtrade Labeling Organizations (FLO) is a non-profit trading company based on social responsibility and whose purpose is to ensure fairness in international trade.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Corporate managers who fail to give due consideration to the rights of employees and other concerned groups in the pursuit of profit are treating these groups as means to the ends of stockholders. This is unjust according to the rights-based ethical framework.
Answer: Shared debt liability
Explanation:
Shared debt liability in this context means that in the case of a default, the owners of the business are personally liable for the debts of the business and so creditors can come for their personal assets to get settlement for the debt.
Both Sole Proprietorships and Partnerships have a shared debt liability with their businesses because if the business defaults on debt and the assets of the business are not sufficient enough to cover the debt, the creditors can come after the personal assets of the sole proprietor or the Partners.