1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna71 [15]
4 years ago
12

Texto 1

World Languages
1 answer:
leonid [27]4 years ago
4 0

1. Os dois textos apresentam como as pessoas que não tem o que comer e onde morar acabam se submetendo a procurar, no lixo, restos de comida que possam saciar a sua fome.

2. a) O texto 1 apresenta uma linguagem pessoal, carregada de sentimentos já que o orador afirma que presenciar os mendigos fazendo do lixo um banquete, é uma cena lamentável. Além de que é lamentável a sujeira que eles provocam depois de comer. b) O texto 2 apresenta função poetica da linguagem, já que apresenta a atividade dos mendigos em forma de poesia, o que acaba aliviando esse tema tão pesado. c) O texto 2 apresenta a linguagem figurada, conotativa e rica de sentidos, quando compara o homem a um bicho, representando como os homens perdem a racionalidade e o bom senso diante da fome.

3. a) as negativas com o efeito de expectativa, já que faz um certo suspenso a cerca da identidade do bicho. b) Sugere a condição de irracionalidade. Isso mostra que diante da fome o homem pode perder as suas capacidades cognitivas igualando-se a um animal irracional que procura o que comer sem se preocupar com a qualidade e a higiene. c) O eu lírico demostra indignação, pois fica indignado ao saber que o ser humano pode se comportar dessa forma.

4. a) Considerando o título podemos considerar que o texto 1 parece enfocar no descaso das grandes companhias em tomar conta de seus lixos, evitando que uma pessoa ou animal possa mexer deles e provocar uma grande sujeira na cidade. b) O texto 2, por sua vez, enfoca na situação precária de pessoas que vivem abaixo da linha de pobreza e que são negligenciadas pelo governo, ao ponto de não possuírem o direito básico a alimentação.

You might be interested in
(स) पर्यावरणीय सन्तुलन र जैविक विविधताका बिचमा के अन्तर छ ?​
Vadim26 [7]
Thats so cool! i bet that was fun to learn
5 0
3 years ago
KAHULUGAN NG PAPAWIRIN
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

kahulugan ay langit or sky

Explanation:

sana brainliest

3 0
3 years ago
Read the rough draft. Plastic water bottles are harmful to our communities. The water within them is consumed in seconds, and th
Vinvika [58]
Though many may not realize, plastic water bottles are extremely harmful to our community. The water within them is consumed within seconds, and afterwards many become litter for our roadways. Even when properly disposed of, these water bottles remain issue. Plastic water bottles are being used faster than they can be recycled. Many people have converted to using an eco-friendlier option, dishwasher-safe bottles that can be used countless times. Many may think re-useable water bottles are too expensive, difficult to clean, or simply refuse to drink tap water, but the truth is the pros of re-useable water bottles heavily outweigh the cons. Countless studies show that tap water provides the same hydration as bottled water, and for some it is even easier to attain. There are many solutions to your re-useable water bottle problems, many of which cost less than the amount of money you spend on bottled water every year. Re-useable water bottles come in a variety of styles, sizes, and colors. Additionally, landfills constantly struggle to break down the large amount of plastic disposed there, so what’s a little inconvenience as to saving our planet?
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Por y paraDrop down Activity InstructionsComplete the sentences with por or para. April 02 11:59 PM 1 attempt remaining Grade se
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

Fui a comprar frutas por mi madre.

Fui a comprar frutas para mi madre.

Rita le dio dinero para la computadora portátil.

Rita le dio dinero por la computadora portátil.

La familia los llevó por los Andes.

La familia los llevó para los Andes.

Explanation:

'Por' and 'para' can both be used as translation of for, by, on, through, because of, in exchange for, in order to, and many more prepositions and expressions, so it might be tricky to understand the difference.

The distinction is that, whereas 'por' refers to movement, means of travel ('los llevó por los Andes'), communication, exchanges ('dinero por la computadora'), duration, and motivation, the word 'para' refers to destinations ('los llevó para los Andes'), recipients, deadlines, and goals.

8 0
3 years ago
Here this is the image
dem82 [27]

Answer:

ok whats the question?

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When a reader makes inferences based on the details provided it unable the reader to
    12·1 answer
  • banks in the 1990s were more likely to approve whites for home loans than blacks or latinos this is an example of
    13·1 answer
  • hey guys who wanna talk for a bit come and talk for me and my girl and we see how u can make a girl ur girlfriend
    9·1 answer
  • Which revision of the following sentence best indicates who did the cleaning up after the game?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following is expression?
    12·1 answer
  • Links or just answering for points will be reported
    13·1 answer
  • 戻る<br> 地域を選択<br> アメリカ合衆国<br> アイスランド<br> Translate this please
    14·1 answer
  • Eolmayeyo ?<br> chun + yesun / dasot * eel
    7·1 answer
  • Who else wants to become kpop idol✋?
    5·2 answers
  • How do speaking and writing different
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!