The conflict provided can be best described as an external conflict, more specifically a character vs. society type of conflict, as further explained below.
<h3>What is conflict?</h3>
This question seems to be missing the answer choices and, because we were not able to find the complete question online, we will provide you with a general answer to help you. First, let's understand that a conflict, in literature, is a fight or opposition between two forces.
First, we can divide conflict into two types:
- External conflict - between the character and an external force.
- Internal conflict - between the character and his own thoughts, feelings, fears, etc.
Another possible categorization of conflicts is:
The conflict described in the scenario in the question is an external conflict, more specifically a character vs. society one. The character is the wrongfully accused man, and he needs to prove to society, represented by the jury, that he is innocent.
Learn more about conflict here:
brainly.com/question/1658512
#SPJ1
Yes I would love to go on a working holiday. I work a a family business so any break I can get would be most helpful. I would use that break to go on a vacation,and take my family of course. So yes I would love to go on a working holiday.
hope this helps! skittlez20
Answer:
In Chapter 22, Cal has a brief encounter with an instructor who, “despite the fact that he is an Indian himself” writes Cal "a demerit for typical Indian laziness" (235-236).
Explanation:
im gonna explain:
In Chapter 22, Cal has a brief encounter with an instructor who, “despite the fact that he is an Indian himself” writes Cal "a demerit for typical Indian laziness" (235-236). Later in the chapter, Mr. O’Boyle demonstrates blatant racism when he asks Cal, “‘You like-um them shoes, Chief? You want buy-um?’” (241). These passages illustrates some of the prejudices held towards Indians, and some students may find it offensive. Encourage concerned students to process these experiences from Cal's perspective, using evidence from the text. Consider questions like: How do you think Cal feels about Mr. Handler and Mr. O’Boyle? Why do you think Cal points out that Mr. Handler is himself a North Carolina Cherokee? How might Handler's being Cherokee impact Cal's understanding of this situation? What does Cal’s reaction to Mr. O’Boyle’s mockery reveal about his experiences with these types of encounters?
Answer:
MAKE NO CHANGE
Explanation:
There is nothing wrong with the punctuation of the sentence we are analyzing here. First, let's take a look at the colon. When we need to introduce a long list of items, a colon should be used right before the list begins. That is exactly what we have here. The speaker placed a colon before listing the locations to be visited.
Now, we can usually separate the items in a list with commas. However, in this case, not only do we have long names for each location, but we also have the "location of the location". That is, a certain museum is located in a certain city, and to separate the name of the museum from the name of the city, we must use a comma already. For that reason, when we name another location, a different one, we should use a semicolon instead of a comma.
Answer:
The correct option is three
Explanation:
The Bill of right was written to appease the colonies worried about the rights in joining the Union.
