Answer:
It's an observational study.
Explanation:
Because the study was focused on the reactions of the toddlers with the robot, the mainly thing on it was the behavior of them and reaction after the adult left the room; they used variants for them to compared and therefore has a more clear result.
In a series of Supreme Court rulings under Chief Justice Earl Warren, beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, "separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional because new research demonstrated that separating students by "race" was detrimental to them, even if facilities were equal.
<h3>Which Supreme Court decision caused the separate but equal concept to be abolished?</h3>
- The separate but equal theory was abolished as a result of the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court ruling.
- The 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education, which overturned the "separate but equal" principle and ordered an end to school segregation, is one of the most well-known decisions to come out of this time period.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
To learn more about the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court, refer to the following link:
brainly.com/question/9822748
#SPJ4
Answer:
d) all of these: nominated by the president, confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and appointed for an indefinite period providing they maintain "good behavior."
Explanation:
Federal judges, who are the ones that are that preside over the Supreme Court proceedings and evaluate laws, are indeed nominated by the President, by the U.S. Senate, and appointed for an indefinite period providing they maintain "good behavior" or until they decide to retain, as Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution provides:
<em>he (The President) </em><em>shall nominate</em><em>, and by and </em><em>with the advice and consent of the Senate</em><em>, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, </em><em>judges</em><em> of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States.</em>
And as Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states:
<em>The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior</em>
With this latter provision, the Constitution guarantees that judges make decisions and evaluate statutes according to what is right under the law, and not according to popular's opinion or political pressure. This way, judges don’t have to fear that they will be fired if they make an unpopular decision.
