Exposure to nature relaxes us and reduces levels of stress. True or False

Social Studies

2 answers:

sleet_krkn [62]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The statement is true.

Explanation:

Stress is the response that our body gives to various situations that cause enough tension to be considered a threat. According to some research, being in contact with nature lowers stress hormones, in terms of efficiently reducing the levels of the stress hormone cortisol, spending 20 to 30 minutes sitting or walking in a place that provides a sensation of nature, it also reduces glucose levels, which are directly related to diseases such as obesity or type diabetes. It improves mood, vitality and psychological well-being, reducing psychological tension, stress, anxiety, insomnia, depression, anger and fatigue.

eduard3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Research reports suggest that exposure to nature such as a walk in the forest, park, or sitting beside a river, stream or beach triggers the release of anti stress hormones and reduces stress levels in humans.

You might be interested in

As result of the Hundred Years' War, the feudal knight was discredited and European countries established professional standing

amm1812

True
/.....................................................................

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What motivated us congress to pass the sedition act

AnnZ [28]

The Sedition Act of 1918 (May 16, 1918) was an amendment to the Espionage Act of 1917 passed at the urging of President Woodrow Wilson.

3 0

3 years ago

Is a diary a primary or secondary source?

Tema [17]

A primary source. A primary sources are first hand accounts like diaries, autobiographies, etc.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the dispute over the use

Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

Iconoclastic Controversy, a dispute over the use of religious images (icons) in the Byzantine Empire in the 8th and 9th centuries. ... The defenders of the use of icons insisted on the symbolic nature of images and on the dignity of created matter.

7 0

3 years ago

Dr. Daniela Yeung, a health psychologist, has been conducting a federally funded ethnographic study of couples in which the male

Anon25 [30]

Answer:

1) This situation is out of the standard set by Tarasoff decision’s duty to protect because the situation is severe and Dr. Yeung should not rely on probability. This could be possible that Aiden was trying to threaten Dr. Yeung and demanding no interference in his personal life. Dr. Yeung is a health psychologist but as a psychologist, she could understand the seriousness of the situation so she must call the professional support. Dr. Yeung should refer this case to the clinical psychologist and provide support to them about the health and behavior conditions.

2) Ethically, Dr. Yeung’s decision may affect the research purpose but morally her decision may help a person who needs it. The decision of Dr. Yeung was exceptional so it must be considered as an exceptional condition.

3) Dr. Yeung should consult the clinical psychologist and psychiatrists before handling this type of case. Dr. Yeung was not assigned to handle abnormal behavior problems and therapies, she could have handled the situation as an exceptional condition and with the help of team support.

4) Dr. Yeung should consider this case as health and abnormal behavior problem rather than a general condition. The behavior of Aiden was destructive and it should be analyzed with the help of security agencies, medical practitioner, psychologist and psychiatric. Dr. Yeung tried to done her job well but her lack of experience could have threaten her and patient’s life. I think, Dr. Yeung should demand professional help and experienced services.

3 0

3 years ago