Answer:
Even though I have no symptoms I want to live a long long healthy life so I have embraced healthy eating and regular exercise.
Explanation:
Proactive healthcare was different from the reactive in the sense that action is taking before symptoms manifest. It follows that rule precaution is better than treatment. rather than waiting for the symptoms in influenza, you start to take a proactive approach towards your health by boosting your immune system by taking some medicine like vitamin C. It is the process that someone wants to get the things to do. If you are proactive then you want to be things that happened rather than waiting for things happened. It does mean that thinking and action happened before the disease anticipated. Being proactive it is important to stay happy and stay away from illness. Living proactively means to stay healthy and increase the well being and longevity, and can help you avoid unnecessary health problem and expanses.
Answer:
Ending Mexican-American War
Explanation:
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was created after United States troops managed to conquered their capital in Mexico City. The Mexican government proposed the treaty to prevent more unnecessary bloodsheds.
The Mexican government agreed to give United States with the ownership o Carolina and New Grande. In exchange, the United States government need to pull their troops from Mexican territory.
Answer:
The planning fallacy
Explanation:
The planning fallacy concept was first given by Denial Kahneman in 1977.it is the most universal and consistent demonstrated cognitive bias that most people do have. There is common misconception related to the planning fallacy is that people underestimate the time, cost and risk that it will take to do something, If they have already experience about the task entails. It is an overly optimistic plan.
<u>For example:</u> A house can be built on time, if there is no payment delay, no employee absences, no hazardous weather conditions. But there is most probably chances of one condition that can occur.
Underestimate the fallacy will lead a project in delaying. Optimism is a great quality but sometimes it creates hazardous when you underestimate time and cost and will leads to the in-completion of the projects.
Answer:
OOh this is what we are doing right now ok so the answer would be, D.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, Quebec should be a country.
Canada is a federation, meaning that its citizens have to pay taxes for both the federal (canadian) government and the provincial (quebec) government. This split makes it harder for the people of Quebec to strategically invest in its own industries. For example, Quebec has long ago nationalized hydroelectricity making the state a leader in green energy. When Quebecers decided to do so, the canadian government refused to invest even a single dollar in the project. Quebec’s prime minister at that time had to go see the americans to ask for a sufficient loan. What a shame it was to the canadian government going against such a nice project! Fast forward to now, Nova Scotia government (another province located next to Quebec being part of the canadian confederation) has the project to built all the infrastructure to export hydroelectricity to the US… and guess what? Canadian Government is totally in favor of the idea and willing to fund the project with fresh capital, part of that capital coming from taxes paid by Quebecers. So Quebec taxes will help fund a competitor since Quebec is already exporting a lot of energy to their US partners while it had absolutely no help when they built their own hydroelectricity project.
This example is just one of the many examples that Quebecers have had to endure over the past decades. When the financial crisis happened in 08-09, Ontario’s auto industry have been bailed out for more than $10 Billion from the Canadian Government (again, part of this money - roughly 20% - came from Quebec’s taxes paid to the federal government). At that same time, Quebec was struggling with its paper/pulp industry and the federal government injected less than 100M$ in the industry to help it. Now Bombardier, one of the great engeneering business of Quebec is struggling, and guess what? Quebec has to inject all of the money to help them since canadian government won't do a single thing.
A lot of the people in Quebec stand against the building of pipelines that would allow dirty oil sands to cross the eastern part of the country for international exportation. Canadians want Quebec to accept the pipeline since it would help the western part of the country to export/sell its dirty oil internationally. As a province, Quebec doesn’t have any legal capacity to oppose to such project while this goes a lot against their willingness. If Quebec was a country, it could oppose to such thing and participate to a greater extend to a cleaner planet. Quebecers have all the capacity and knowledge to invest massively in clean energy and stop using oil for transport over a short timeframe. The only things that is keeping them away is the fact that it does not have control over all its revenues while the federal government have a totally different gameplan.
Being a country would allow Quebecers to gain 100% control over their taxes and would leave them with more money to do good things for the whole planet. We would be leaders in clean energy instead of subsidizing the dirty oilsands in the western part of the country. Our army would be one of peace keeping and territory protection and our peace keeping message would be heard amongst UN and UNESCO. We would be a much better leader amongst nations willing the reduce greenhouse gas instead of financing oil sands. Our engineering firms like Hydro-Quebec would be venturing project like electrification of transport.
Not only Quebec should be a country but people all around the world should support them in their quest for the building of a great new country.
