Symbolic interactionists seek to understand the experience of inequality - how it is communicated and how that inequality is conveyed.
Social inequality is the state of unequal access to the benefits of a society. In a purely egalitarian society, all citizens are equally capable of contributing to the general welfare of that society, and they too can benefit from their membership in that society.
The functionalist theory of social inequality holds that stratification exists because it benefits society. Key examples of social inequality include income gap, gender inequality, health care, and social class. In the healthcare sector, some people get better and more professional care than others. They also have to pay more for these services.
Conflict theory views social life as a competition and focuses on the distribution of resources, power, and inequality. Symbolic interaction theory holds that people respond to elements in their environment based on subjective meanings. they are tied to these elements, such as the meanings created and modified by social interaction involving symbolic communication with others.
While it may sound like a big name, symbolic interactivity is how your experience adds subjective meaning to symbols and letters. For example, the word "dog" is just a series of letters. Through your interaction with the letters "dog", you see this is a dog with fur on four legs.
To learn more about inequality:
brainly.com/question/1870140
#SPJ4
It removed barriers to gender discrimination in professions such as medicine, law and the civil service. Many educated middle class women benefited as a result. The unintended impact of the war enabled women to break through many of the social, economic and political barriers that had dominated pre-war Britain.
You will graduate in 2022 if you keep your grades up
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
