1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olchik [2.2K]
4 years ago
8

Criminalist Ben Baldanza is collecting evidence from the scene of a shooting. After locating the revolver sus- pected of firing

the shots, Ben picks the gun up by the grip, unloads it, and places the ammunition in an enve- lope. He then attaches an identification tag to the grip. Searching the scene, Ben finds a bullet lodged in the wall. He uses pliers to grab the bullet and pull it from the wall, then inscribes the bullet with his initials and places it in an envelope. What mistakes, if any, did Ben make in collecting this evidence?
Law
2 answers:
Musya8 [376]4 years ago
3 0

Answer and explanation:

The correct answer with it's due explanation is:

-Before unloading the revolver Ben should have noticed the position of the revolver and put a mark in the place where the chamber was aligned with barrel.

-Since each chamber is signed with a unique number on the diagram, when casing removed, he should have marked each cartridge so the number in the chamber correspond.

-He should divide every cartridge in different envelope.

-The identification tag should have been put in the trigger guard.

-The bullet must be removed without any direct contact so it won't deform, and put in a tissue paper.

Leona [35]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

  • He did not photograph the scene.
  • He didn't wear gloves.
  • He contaminate the evidence.
  • He didn't write down the bullet number.

Explanation:

The <u>first step</u> before moving something from the scene would be to photograph it, since that way we can always see the position of the weapon and any other detail we need.

Immediately continue to wear gloves to touch any type of test and not contaminate it with our fingerprints.

Then we should review any type of evidence that may have been removed, like some hair by the wind or some dry spot that is dark.

Also is necessary to compare the bullet number with the weapon to see if they correspond and put dust for fingerprint detection on all the evidence and remove it with tape.

To finish the evidence they go in a bag and on this the label to not contaminate in any way, and to be able to carry out the studies that have to be carried out later.

You might be interested in
What are your thoughts on the fact that defendants can engage in bargaining, more frequently initiated by the prosecutor?
Kruka [31]

Answer:

Some prosecutors also use plea bargains as a way to encourage defendants to testify against codefendants or other accused criminals. Plea bargains allow prosecutors to avoid trials, which are shunned because they are time-consuming, labour-intensive, and costly but carry no guarantee of success.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Bago tayo maniwala sa balita o palatastas dapat ay palaging may ?<br> clue: HANDBEAS
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

Basehan

dapat may basehan para kapani-paniwala

7 0
3 years ago
The Fifteenth Amendment A. Guaranteed all men the right to vote. B. Guaranted all citizens the right to vote. C. Prohibited disf
Tresset [83]

Answer:

Prohibited disfranchisement on account of race, color, or creed.

Explanation:

The 15th Amendment states that the right of United States of American citizen’s to vote shall not be denied or cut short by any state of the federation or the by the country based on race, color or previous condition of servitude. This law made the African-American people to have the ability to vote and it was rightly adopted and included in the constitution of the US in 1870.

5 0
3 years ago
HELPPPPPPPPPPP PLZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS FIRST!!!!!!!!!!
xenn [34]

Answer:

A. Liuidated damages ejdjfjxnfndj

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The power of judicial review applies to actions by.
erica [24]

There are different kinds of power. The power of judicial review applies to actions by the legislative, executive, and administrative arms of the government

<h3>What is the power of judicial review?</h3>

The judicial review is known to be the power of the courts of a country to look into the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative aspect of the government of any country.

They act to known or determine if the actions done by those branches of government are consistent with what is written in the constitution.

Actions seen or  judged as inconsistent are said to be unconstitutional and, therefore regarded as null and void.

Learn more about power of judicial review from

brainly.com/question/4937540

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between sheriff and police
    15·1 answer
  • You must use headlights when driving
    8·2 answers
  • I'm trying to mail my father whom is in a Correction center called Spring Creek in lower Alaska. It says in the "in order to mai
    9·2 answers
  • Court systems are established by ?
    9·1 answer
  • One of the factors considered in determining the state statute to be constitutional and allow the states to regulate aspects of
    11·1 answer
  • Alternative dispute resolution is _____. (Select all that apply.)
    12·2 answers
  • How do you think the "president" FYI IN NAME ONLY is running the country right now?
    11·1 answer
  • The Bill Of Rights was created to product us from the Government how does the first Amendment product out right? pleasee, i need
    6·1 answer
  • The 1967 u. S. Supreme court decision that declared unconstitutional the laws in sixteen states that prohibited interracial marr
    13·1 answer
  • One of the fundamental rights of defendants in the justice system is the right to a fair trial. How is this right protected when
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!