1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olchik [2.2K]
4 years ago
8

Criminalist Ben Baldanza is collecting evidence from the scene of a shooting. After locating the revolver sus- pected of firing

the shots, Ben picks the gun up by the grip, unloads it, and places the ammunition in an enve- lope. He then attaches an identification tag to the grip. Searching the scene, Ben finds a bullet lodged in the wall. He uses pliers to grab the bullet and pull it from the wall, then inscribes the bullet with his initials and places it in an envelope. What mistakes, if any, did Ben make in collecting this evidence?
Law
2 answers:
Musya8 [376]4 years ago
3 0

Answer and explanation:

The correct answer with it's due explanation is:

-Before unloading the revolver Ben should have noticed the position of the revolver and put a mark in the place where the chamber was aligned with barrel.

-Since each chamber is signed with a unique number on the diagram, when casing removed, he should have marked each cartridge so the number in the chamber correspond.

-He should divide every cartridge in different envelope.

-The identification tag should have been put in the trigger guard.

-The bullet must be removed without any direct contact so it won't deform, and put in a tissue paper.

Leona [35]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

  • He did not photograph the scene.
  • He didn't wear gloves.
  • He contaminate the evidence.
  • He didn't write down the bullet number.

Explanation:

The <u>first step</u> before moving something from the scene would be to photograph it, since that way we can always see the position of the weapon and any other detail we need.

Immediately continue to wear gloves to touch any type of test and not contaminate it with our fingerprints.

Then we should review any type of evidence that may have been removed, like some hair by the wind or some dry spot that is dark.

Also is necessary to compare the bullet number with the weapon to see if they correspond and put dust for fingerprint detection on all the evidence and remove it with tape.

To finish the evidence they go in a bag and on this the label to not contaminate in any way, and to be able to carry out the studies that have to be carried out later.

You might be interested in
Article I of the Constitution lays out which major role of the Federal government?
gtnhenbr [62]
Article One of the United States Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the federal government, the United States Congress. ... Article One's Vesting Clause grants all federal legislative power to Congress and establishes that Congress consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which purchase item acts as a suitable target under routine activity theory?
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

Id say a camera for what ive read seems the most likely for criminal activities considering the rest are everyday items youd have to be creative to think of a use for criminal wise but a camera is the most usual item.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When is a statement against interest also a hearsay?
andre [41]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Declarations against interest are an exception to the rule on hearsay in which a person's statement may be used, where generally the content of the statement is so prejudicial to the person making it that he would not have made the statement unless he believed the statement was true.

And statements are usually made in court.

Statement Offered Against a Party That Wrongfully Caused the Declarant’s Unavailability. A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result.

is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarant’s statement because of the court rules

3 0
3 years ago
List 4 types of people Texas law would consider a family member.
stich3 [128]

Answer:

a current or former spouse.

a child of a current or former spouse.

a person with whom the offender has a child or children.

a foster child or foster parent of the offender.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
In your opinion, have Supreme Court interpretations of free speech changed over time? If so, how? Give examples.
bearhunter [10]
I think the Supreme Courts interpretations of free speech have become more libertarian over time. For example, free speech on LGBT matters would have been strictly prohibited a century ago.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Suppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used t
    13·1 answer
  • American courts often make decisions by relying on the principle of stare decisis. True or False
    8·1 answer
  • According to Merton's strain theory, individual's living in environments of social strain will adapt in one of 5 ways.
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the difference between science and philosophy?
    9·2 answers
  • ESOS PAISES SON DESARROLLADOS O ESTAN EN DESARROLLO
    8·1 answer
  • AvE= r o t =lop= so rithuhsjkhfjkdjg =?
    5·1 answer
  • A man suspected of a violent crime
    8·1 answer
  • Roads in urban areas are generally _____.
    14·1 answer
  • What is the rule of law​
    6·1 answer
  • The court cases San Antonio Independent School District v.Rodriguez and Serrano v. Priest dealt with concerns over ______.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!