Answer:
A. If my answer is wrong, please correct me :).
Explanation:
Their science is just chem and physics don’t know man
Answer:Weak,Inductive,Uncogent
Explanation:This tries to compare Sierra Nevada mountain range and the island of Jamaica are both popular tourist destinations.
The conclusion made by this statement is WEAK, INDUCTIVE AND UNCOGENT.
The information about the bringing of Ski equipment when traveling to Jamaica in February is not a strong, deductive and cogent conclusion as both areas are not exactly the same as stated by the write up.
A conclusion is said to be weak when it does not have strong evidence to back it up,it is said to be inductive if it is not fully supported by the premise and it is said to be Uncogent when the argument is not clear and believable.
Answer:
A. The words "good dog"
Explanation:
In this case, we know that the primary reinforcer is the treat. The dog is gaining an immediate reward for doing what you wanted it to do. But even after it, you also praise the dog. This praise is the secondary reinforcement. The secondary reinforcement will allow the trainer to deliver reinforcement even if the dog is not hungry, which might cause problems if you only use the primary reinforcement.
Think about what a complex system a modern economy is. It includes all
production of goods and services, all buying and selling, all
employment. The economic life of every individual is interrelated, at
least to a small extent, with the economic lives of thousands or even
millions of other individuals. Who organizes and coordinates this
system? Who insures that, for example, the number of televisions a
society provides is the same as the amount it needs and wants? Who
insures that the right number of employees work in the electronics
industry? Who insures that televisions are produced in the best way
possible? How does it all get done?
