1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nevsk [136]
3 years ago
13

How does economic freedom seem to correlate to a country's economic wealth an individual opportunity?

Social Studies
2 answers:
goblinko [34]3 years ago
7 0
The fact that free country knows that benefit of the country is the benefit of every individual with lack of boundaries 
Verizon [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Economic freedom is a term used in economic research and in political debates. It signifies the opportunity for companies and residents to conduct economic activities with as little government intervention as possible. Economic freedom is considered to be great if taxes are low, if ownership is maintained, if regulations and bans are few, and if trade is free.

Economic freedom contributes to the economic development of nations, as it allows individuals and businesses to enjoy greater opportunities for growth through investments or the development of new jobs. Thus, a flow of money is generated that contributes to the dynamism of the economy, generating social improvements and stability for citizens.

You might be interested in
In order to protect a nation’s car manufacturing industry from foreign car producers, the government charges the importer a fee
artcher [175]
Tariff makes the most sense. Embargo is a ban on goods or a country, subsidy is money granted from the government to a business and has nothing to do with trade, quota is a limited amount of a product and again doesn't really have anything to do with trade. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which americans would be most likely to object to calhoun's proposed constitutional system?
Ad libitum [116K]

The Americans that would most likely object to the proposed constitutional system of Calhoun are the southern planters. It is because of the reason that the Calhoun has an idea where in the majority is the one responsible for having to conclude or establish the final decision in which is not in the favor of the slaves.

3 0
3 years ago
how do th location and climate of the United kingdom and russia affect how each country conducts trade
AnnZ [28]
United Kingdom is surrounded with bodies of water; thus, it is easier for them to trade with people from different countries all over the world. Ships carrying various goods from different parts of the world would dock in UK ports and trade their goods for the goods found in UK. People living in UK has livelihoods that are depended on land (farming) and water (fishing).

Since UK is surrounded by bodies of water, it enjoys a milder climate compared with Russia.

Russia, on the otherhand, occupies some parts of Europe and Asia. But, Russians can not maximize the use of their land area since there are parts of Russia wherein there are permanently frozen land. Russia is also bordered by 15 countries with no access to waterways, making trading difficult but possible.

Most Russians live in the European part of the country because it has a better weather condition and trade among neighbouring countries can easily be done.
6 0
3 years ago
European countries practiced an economic system called mercantilism. How did it work?
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

D. European countries made money by sending resources back to their home country to sell

Explanation:

Mercantilism is an economic policy that is designed to maximize exports and minimize imports for an economy.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To establish duress, there must be proof of a threat to do something that the ______ party has no right to do. Generally the thr
klemol [59]

Answer: threatening; illegal; incapable; suing

Explanation: Duress simply means coercing, pressuring or forcing an individual to perform an unwilling action.

Therefore, To establish duress, there must be proof of a threat to do something that the threatening party has no right to do, Generally the threatening act must be wrongful or illegal and must render the threatened person incapable of exercising free will. A threat to do something legal such as suing someone ordinarily is not Duress.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Most countries today have privately owned businesses that are allowed to decide what, how, and for whom to produce goods but are
    5·2 answers
  • Can u please give a description for each one easy work also a lot of extra points
    9·1 answer
  • What does nulify mean?
    15·1 answer
  • Lines on a weather map that connect areas of equal air pressure are
    15·2 answers
  • How does specialization enable countries to trade with one another? A country can make and sell goods affordably and buy goods t
    5·2 answers
  • which of these was one of the few successes of the United States government under the Article of Confederation
    15·1 answer
  • How does an invisible hand directing an individual's economic choices benefit society as a whole?
    5·2 answers
  • Why were so many Southerners opposed to Abraham Lincoln?
    15·1 answer
  • Its an urgent plese answer this​
    14·2 answers
  • A parable is a story that is used to teach a lesson about what is right
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!