A government in which citizens choose members of a legislature to make policy, rather than making it themselves, was favored because
b. direct government by citizens was impractical, even though, in theory, direct democracy was more desirable than representative government.
Explanation:
Direct government made by the people for the people is what democracy was supposed to be about in the time but that model of work was impractical enough to not be considered seriously by the founding fathers who instead sought to make it a representative democracy.
A representative democracy is also much more suitable because only the people who have a genuine skill in making laws are brought in to make laws and the public gets their say in who does it for them.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
below are the choices:
a.Liberty
<span>b.Popular Sovereignty </span>
<span>c.Pluralism </span>
<span>d.Equality
</span>Popular Sovereignty
<span>You don't know the power commanded by the oligarchs with their bribes, lobbying, and subsidies. Your vote doesn't even count anymore. What we have lost is the ability of the commoner to get a say for what others are going to do. Special interests, complicated partisan maneuvering, political standstill on every level makes the rise of the Sith a very real possibility in our government.</span>
Answer:
because it's good to do good deeds for others ,gratitude,humanity ,
Explanation:
