Answer:worst offender, a dirty energy source that produces less than half our electricity but nearly 80 percent of all power plant carbon emissions.
The good news is that coal is on the decline. Many old and inefficient coal plants are closing down and essentially no new coal plants are being built in the US, a trend that is driving the largest transformation of the US electricity system in half a century.
The energy choices we make during this pivotal moment will carry huge consequences for our health, our climate, and our economy for decades to come.
Right now we are moving toward a natural gas-dominated electricity system, but an over-reliance on natural gas has significant risks and is not a long-term solution to our energy needs. Like coal, it is a fossil fuel that generates substantial global warming emissions, and has other health, environmental, and economic risks.
There's a better, cleaner way to meet our energy needs. Renewable energy resources like wind and solar power generate electricity with little or no pollution and global warming emissions—and could reliably and affordably provide up to 40 percent of US electricity by 2030, and 80 percent by 2050.
To create a cleaner, safer, and healthier energy future, it's time to choose renewables first.
Explanation:
I'll assume that's a thesis statement meant for argument or debate. An argument could be made on either side, depending on your point of view.
- On the one hand, the United States and the Soviet Union had dramatically different worldviews. The US system of democracy and capitalism was at odds with the USSR system of totalitarian rule and communist collectivism. The two nations were allied only for the sake of defeating Germany and Japan in the Second World War, and were in opposition to each other in about every other way. Following the war, they became bitter opponents in the Cold War.
- On the other hand, the USA and the other Allies in World War II needed the help of the Soviet Union in order to defeat the combined threat of Germany and Japan. The USSR suffered millions of casualties due to the war -- more than any other nation. They bore the brunt of the fighting against Germany, even before the US entered the war. And President Roosevelt, while not in agreement with the governing philosophy of Joseph Stalin, still thought he was someone that could be worked with cooperatively. (When President Truman took over after Roosevelt's death, he did not share that same view of Stalin and the USSR.)
So the matter can be argued from both sides. Pick your side and write a strong essay!
Alaska is rich in timers, and minerals, and oils.
Your welcome
Answer:
Debatable, but the answer you're likely looking for is Karl Marx and Fredrich Engel's 1848 document on political theory, the <em>Manifesto of the Communist Party. </em>
Explanation:
Now known as <em>The Communist Manifesto, </em>the document contains Marx and Engel's analysis of communism and the class-struggle. Within, Marx writes, "The supremacy of the proletariat will cause them to vanish still faster. United action, of the leading civilized countries at least, is one of the first conditions for the emancipation of the proletariat." While the term "world revolution" isn't explicitly used, the passage eludes to it's underlying concepts.
Feel free to message me if you need anything clarified
