<h3><u>
Full question:</u></h3>
Why is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model but NOT in the classical model?
A) The Keynesian model assumes that the level of real GDP is inflexible.
B) The Keynesian model assumes that people work for motives other than those of earning an income for themselves and supporting a family.
C) The Keynesian model assumes that workers can lose their jobs to foreign competition during economic downturns.
D) The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward.
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward - is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The classical model is quite the usual microeconomic principles. Keynes claimed that the classical model is not common. In the classical model, the basis for the rationalizing is notional demand and supply, which implies market equilibrium. Keynes proposed the idea of aggregate demand, the overall demand for products and services in the economy.
Keynes supposed that the unemployment force persists regularly. Keynes was suspicious that the economic dominance of demand and supply drive the economy to a common equilibrium. Rising government spending or cutting taxes will boost aggregate demand.
<u />
A slow change such as continents moving will create differences in ecosystems. This is also the same effect caused by a rapid change such a meteorite striking earth. These two phenomena will create diversity and different living conditions. The slow change however, will give organisms time to adopt giving them a good chance of survival unlike a rapid change which will give most, if not all, organisms little chance to survive.
People might be able to solve coal mining from harming habitats maybe by finding a new way to run trains instead of coal. or by mining for coal less.
Answer:
Environment is a major part of one's life. With increasing globalization, the environment has been effected only n the most adverse of ways.
One of the learned behaviours that I have learned through changing in the environment is to throw trash only in the trash can and try not to use too much plastic. The reason is that plastic is non degradable and it will never be used as something that benefits the earth, instead it ends up in places where it only hurts the living organisms.
Currently the pollution index is not too good, therefore vehicles that eat up and release too much of smoke in the environment must be used very less. Environment friendly behaviors should be adapted to get rid of smog and other harmful inhalers.