In the ruling by the supreme court in regents of the university of california v bakke ( 1978 ) : ( A ) affirmative action programs do not violate the constitution
<h3>Regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978)</h3>
In the ruling the supreme court ruled that the use of affirmative action programmes which allows the admission of minority applicants in the universities is a constitutional process in certain circumstances, while the use of racial quotas for the admission into universities was ruled as unconstitutional.
Hence we can conclude In the ruling by the supreme court in regents of the university of california v bakke ( 1978 ) : ( A ) affirmative action programs do not violate the constitution
Learn more Regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978) :brainly.com/question/412541
#SPJ1
You could tell her she is wrong, and that only agents selling Employer/union group plans are permitted an exemption from testing, but some employer/union group plans may require testing to promote agent compliance with CMS marketing requirements.
<h3>What is the advice for a Medicare colleague?</h3>
Since she works at a third-party marketing organization (TMO) and she said she did not need to take the Medicare training for brokers
We could tell her she is wrong, and that only agents selling Employer/union group plans are permitted an exemption from testing, but some employer/union group plans may require testing to promote agent compliance with CMS marketing requirements.
Complete question is;
Your colleague works at a third party marketing organization, TMO and she said she did not need to take the Medicare training for brokers and agents or pass a test to market Medicare plans since her contract is with the TMO, not the plans that have the products she sells.
Read more about Medicare Colleague at; brainly.com/question/1382377
#SPJ1
It means the retailer has not activated the tickets in the package.
Answer: Her return on investment is 20%
2. $40,000
Explanation:
