A person's total "net worth" =

Name three primary sources of authority that tax professionals should check against the citator before relying on those sources

soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

The three primary sources of authority that tax professionals should check against the citator before relying on those sources for important matters are;

1. Revenue procedures

2. Revenue rulings

3. Judicial decisions

Explanation:

A citator can be defined as an index of legal resources that allows the researcher to find newer documents of the original document and thus the history of statues and cases can be reconstructed. This has been collectively termed as shepardizing. There are different kinds of citators depending on the type of case one is handling. In our case, we are dealing with tax professionals. Tax professionals deal with three primary sources of authority that tax professionals should check against the citator before relying on those sources for important matters. These primary sources are; revenue procedures, revenue rulings and judicial decisions. They are further elaborated below;

1. Revenue procedures

A revenue procedure is a set of guide that give direction on how to apply law, regulations and rulings. They majorly give direction on matters involving tax.

2. Revenue rulings

A revenue ruling is an order directly from the Internal Revenue Services (IRS) that has the full backing of the law and therefor enforceable. Such rulings on revenue, give direction on how the IRS understands the tax laws. Since the IRS is an authority constituted by top-level tax professionals, a revenue ruling can be used by other tax professionals to cite cases of similar nature.

3. Judicial decisions

Judicial decisions is a statement of advice written by a judge or a panel of judges that serves as a guide in solving a legal dispute. They involve a written legal opinion that tends to justify how and why they arrived to that conclusion to solve the dispute. The same thinking can be used by other professionals in other disputes of a similar nature to solve them.

3 0

3 years ago

A common-sized income statement, each item is expressed as a percentage of net income. true false

oee [108]

In a common-sized income statement, each item is expressed as a percentage of net income. TRUE

Commonplace-size earnings statement is the vertical evaluation of the income statement. A vertical analysis indicates all gadgets as chances and now not in absolute figures which affords a higher assessment. each line object is expressed as a percent determined by the base parent within the declaration.

A not unusual length earnings statement is an earnings declaration wherein each line item is expressed as a percent of the price of revenue or income. it's far used for vertical analysis, in which each line object in a monetary assertion is represented as a percentage of a base figure inside the assertion.

Commonplace length statements are usually expressed in the form of percentages. therefore, such statements are also known as a hundred according to cent statements or factor percent statements as all of the individual items are taken as a percent of 100.

Learn more about common-sized here:

brainly.com/question/13478191

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago

a. Only institutions, and not individuals, can participate in derivatives market transactions. b. If you purchased 100 shares of

Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

e. As they are generally defined, money market transactions involve debt securities with maturities of less than one year.

Explanation:

Statement E, As they are generally defined, money market transactions involve debt securities with maturities of less than one year is true.

Statement A is not true. It is primary market transaction.

Statement B is not true. Individuals can also participate in derivatives market transactions.

Statement C is not true. The IPO market is a subset of the primary market.

Statement D is not true. It is a direct transfer of capital.

4 0

3 years ago

JG Asset Services is recommending that you invest $1,500 in a 5-year certificate of deposit (CD) that pays 3.5% interest, compou

skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer:

So after 5 year total amount will be $1781.529

So option (a) is correct option

Explanation:

We have given that JG Asset is recommending that you invest $1500 for 5 years at rate of 3.5%

So principle amount P = $1500

Rate of interest r = 3.5 %

Time n = 5 years

We know that when total amount is given by

$A=P(1+\frac{5.5}{100})^n$ , here r is rate of interest and n is time period

So amount after 5 years will be

$A=1500(1+\frac{3.5}{100})^5=$1781.52$

So after 5 year total amount will be $1781.529

So option (a) is correct option

5 0

2 years ago

The Campbell Company is considering adding a robotic paint sprayer to its production line. The sprayer's base price is $940,000,

Tanya [424]

Answer:

a. Year 0 Net Cash Flows = $984,000

b. We have:

Year 1 net operating cash flows = $306,159

Year 2 net operating cash flows = $332,986

Year 3 net operating cash flows = $261,479

c. Additional Year 3- cash flow = $504,877

d. The machine should be purchased.

Explanation:

We start by first calculating the following:

Initial Investment = Base Price + Modification Cost = $940,000 + $25,000 = $965,000

Useful Life = 3 years

Depreciation in Year 1 = 0.3333 * $965,000 = $321,634.50

Depreciation in Year 2 = 0.4445 * $965,000 = $428,942.50

Depreciation in Year 3 = 0.1481 * $965,000 = $142,916.50

Book Value at the end of Year 3 = $965,000 - $321,634.50 - $428,942.50 - $142,916.50 = $71,506.50

After-tax Salvage Value = Salvage Value - (Salvage Value - Book Value) * Marginal tax rate = $624,000 – ($624,000 - $71,506.50) * 25% = $485,877

Initial Investment in NWC = $19,000

We can now proceed as follows:

a. What is the Year 0 net cash flow?

Year 0 Net Cash Flows = Initial Investment + Initial Investment in NWC = $965,000 + $19,000 = $984,000

b. What are the net operating cash flows in Years 1, 2, 3?

Year 1 net operating cash flows = (Pretax Cost Saving * (1 - tax)) + (tax * Depreciation in year 1) = ($301,000 * (1 – 0.25)) + (0.25 * $321,634.50) = $306,159

Year 2 net operating cash flows = (Pretax Cost Saving * (1 - tax)) + (tax * Depreciation in year 2) = ($301,000 * (1 – 0.25)) + (0.25 * $428,942.50) = $332,986

Year 3 net operating cash flows = (Pretax Cost Saving * (1 - tax)) + (tax * Depreciation in year 3) = ($301,000 * (1 – 0.25)) + (0.25 * $142,916.50) = $261,479

c. What is the additional Year 3- cash flow (i.e. after tax salvage and the return of working capital)?

Additional Year 3- cash flow = NWC recovered + After-tax Salvage Value = $19,000 + $485,877 = $504,877

d. If the project's cost of capital is 12%, should the machine be purchased?

This can be determined from the net present value (NPV) calculated as follows:

NPV = -$984,000 + ($306,159/1.12^1) + ($332,986/1.12^2) + ($261,479/1.12^3) + ($504,877/1.12^3) = $100,287.71

Since the NPV of the machine of $100,287.71 is positive, the machine should be purchased.

7 0

2 years ago