The fallacy for the idea that we put animals that are in irreversible out of their misery, so we should do the same for people is called "Faulty Analogy or Informal Fallacy."
Further Explanation:
This type of fallacy where the reader should put a person out of their misery like we do animals are wanting the reader to ignore how much of a difference there is between animals and humans. The profound differences are often overlooked by the ones using faulty analogy. A person would not be put down because they are ill because the differences in an animal and human.
Faulty analogy/Informal fallacy is when two things could be alike in some ways but far different in other ways. For example, someone could say "a person is immortal" is like "a car can run forever."
Learn more about faulty analogy at brainly.com/question/4025909
#LearnwithBrainly
I go with "Whom". It makes sense.
Answer:
C. Circular reasoning
Explanation:
The statement being made would be considered Circular Reasoning. This is because the statement can be divided into two separate statements, a premise, and a conclusion. Also described as a cause and effect. In the statement, the individual is saying that if they become president, then the conclusion will be that they will organize the bake sale. Therefore, if the premise is false and the individual does not become president then the conclusion is false too and they will not organize a bake sale.
His is meaning the Actor, So I would say Actor
