4 years ago

Which claim is not defensible?

1 answer:

8 0

Answer: The claim that is not defensible is B. George W. Bush was not as talented a poltician as his father, George H. W. Bush.

Explanation: A defensible claim is a claim that can be supported with arguments and evidence. Options A., C. and D. represent defensible claims because they can be justified with arguments. In contrast, option B. represents a mere opinion or personal appreciation: therefore, it cannot be defended with factual information such as statistics. In that way, the correct answer is B. George W. Bush was not as talented a poltician as his father, George H. W. Bush.

You might be interested in

Which of the following did NOT sponsor settlements in North America

LekaFEV [45]

De solo because they didn't settle there problem

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did porcelain change life in europe during the renaissance era?

Paul [167]

There be also shops full of earthen vessels of divers making: redde, greene, yellow, and gilt they made them of very strong earth they put them into their kilns and burne them and [they are] brought into Portugal and carried into Peru and Nova Espana, and into other parts of the world.

3 0

3 years ago

Whic colours are in our nation flag

galben [10]

Answer:

blue red white?

Explanation: wat flag

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Many water routes such as the Strait of Hormuz and the Suez Canal are important to the global

ANTONII [103]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Describe a case in which the Supreme Court used the principle of equal protection — possibly through the equal protection clause

Damm [24]

Answer:

Describe a case in which the Supreme Court used the principle of equal protection — possibly through the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment — to expand civil rights for marginalized groups. Then describe how the Supreme Court used the equal protection clause to limit a program that benefited marginalized groups in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

Explanation:

Aka hope this helps

4 0

3 years ago