To build a better future, we need to know and analyze history. Hence, respecting history is a crucial responsibility as an individual, society, and country as our present condition and future circumstances can be based on it.
<h3 /><h3>What is history?</h3>
History can be defined as a subject that deals with the study and the documentation of the past. Events earlier than the discovery of writing structures are taken into consideration in prehistory.
"History" is an umbrella time period comprising past occasions in addition to the memory, discovery, collection, organization, presentation, and interpretation of those occasions.
The tragic history described can be another person's experience.
Hence, we all as human beings belonging to any corner of the world must respect history at all times.
Learn more about history:
brainly.com/question/2187526
#SPJ1
They would include <span>Consumer Reports magazine
Public sources of information refer to the information that provided by certain members of private sector for another member of the private sector.
So, this would include things such as consumer reports magazine, researchers conducted by the company, etc.</span>
Answer:
For many centuries, natural law was recognized as a type of higher law that spelled out universal truths for the moral ordering of society based on a rational understanding of human nature. As a higher moral law, it gave citizens a standard for determining if the written laws and customs of their nation or any other nation were just or unjust, right or wrong, humane or inhumane. Today, natural law is not discussed very much, at least not explicitly. When mentioned at all, it is usually rejected as dangerous because it undermines existing laws or as intolerant because it is contrary to “multiculturalism,” which requires the non-judgmental acceptance of other cultures.
This negative view of natural law can be traced to Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), whose writings are largely devoted to showing the anarchy and civil wars caused by appeals to natural and divine laws above the will of the sovereign. Hobbes rejected traditional higher law doctrines and encouraged people to accept the established laws and customs of their nations, even if they seemed oppressive, for the sake of civil peace and security. His critique has been a leading cause of the demise of natural law and the acceptance of positive law as the only reliable guide for political authority.
One may be equally surprised to learn, however, that many people today embrace a different (and seemingly contradictory) view of natural law, and this too is traceable to Thomas Hobbes. For example, when conscientious people are confronted with violations of human rights—as in religious theocracies that violate women’s rights or in countries that allow sweatshops to trample on worker’s rights—they feel compelled to protest the injustice of those practices and to change them for the better. The protesters usually deny that they are following natural law, but they obviously are asserting a belief in universal moral truths that are grounded in human nature—in this case, the natural equality of human beings that underlies human rights. This understanding of higher law originates with Hobbes because he was largely responsible for transforming classical natural law into modern natural rights, thereby beginning the “human rights revolution” in thinking on natural law. How is it possible for Hobbes and his followers to embrace seemingly contradictory views of natural law, rejecting one form as intolerant, self-righteous, and anarchical, while embracing another form as the universal ideal of social justice? Let us turn to Hobbes for an answer to this puzzle, and, in so doing, uncover the sources of our modern conceptions of law, rights, and justice.
During the reading instructions what the teacher has to realize here is that there are phonetics irregularities that may affect students by confusing them as they try to decode words that they are not used to.
<h3>What is ESL </h3>
This is a term that stands for English as a second language. ESL is a language that is taught to people in schools who are not familiar with English.
A lot of people in these classes may not be speakers of the language because it is not their native language.
Read more on ESL here:
brainly.com/question/27223721
#SPJ12
The true statement is A.: <span>Civil law is based on religious tenets and beliefs.
Theocracy is a system where the politi</span>cal power resides in the hands of those who have the religious leadership.
