Answer: E. Based on determining long term beneficial consequences.
Explanation: Ethical egoism is the prescriptive or normative doctrine, that each individual seeks only it's one wellness. This is a self interest theory.
Ethical egoism is based on determining long term beneficial consequences of a decision.
Kantianism view decision rightness or wrongness of an individual without considering its consequences. Utilitarianism views ones way of making a right or wrong decision, considering the immediate consequences. While ethical egoism considers the long term consequences of a decision.
All of the above but in terms of United States government and History the answer is C.) Unconstitutional.
<span>In the text the red-line method refers to </span><span>A method of controlling inventories by drawing a red line on the inside of a bin
Often times, often unaware when their inventories storage is about to get exhausted. The red line method will act as a reminder for the workers to refill the inventories when the stack has reached a certain line
</span>
A political viewpoint that favors native inhabitants over immigrants is the best description of a Nativist.
Option 1
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
A nativist by definition is a person or a public viewpoint that favors the provision of better privileges and rights to native residents and inhabitants of an area as opposed to immigrants who merely shifter to the area. A nativist is not a politician related to and favoring only Roman Catholics to office as it relates to all natives and not just Roman Catholics.
A Nativist isn’t necessarily cruel but every cruel leader isn’t a Nativist. A Native American activist is also a decent description but a native activist need not support natives exclusively, just because he is native, making option 1 the best answer.
The information is not common knowledge and does not come from the book being reviewed.
Answer: Option C.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The additional information is the information that is added by the author of the paragraph. It is apart from the central idea or the message of the paragraph. It is not included in the central idea.
This additional information is not included in the central idea and needs to be cited from where did it come. It is not the normal or the common information or common knowledge. So it needs to be cited or written that where it did it come from.
