Answer:
During the Great Depression there was a scarcity of food and resources, so people didn't eat as much as they would prior to the Great Depression. The stock market and banks were reliable before the Great Depression, but during the Great Depression people tried taking out all their money from the banks and tried to sell all of their shares before the stock market crashed.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Corn made substantial gains on cotton acreage during the Civil War. ... Improved strains, more scientific cultivation and fertilization, and expansion of irrigation increased yields of corn in Texas from 10 to 25 bushels an acre during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to 90 to 120 bushels in 1975–80.
Answer: The Grand Canyon was a very fascinating place to visit kinda (very) scary but still very beautiful. Versailles is also I absolutely loved that place.
Explanation: Hope this helps :)!
Answer:
Explanation:
Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.
“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.
OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.
Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.
Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….
Answer:
Charles was King, Cromwell was King in all but name. Both had their own "Personal Rules" Charles from 1629 to 1640 and Cromwell from 16th December 1653 to 3rd September 1654 when they ruled without Parliament. Both had their own council of advisors; Charles had a privy council and Cromwell had a Council of State
