1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jolli1 [7]
3 years ago
9

I am studying a fish-eating hawk that lives by large lakes and find that it could capture more pounds of fish per unit time if i

t were to hunt farther from shore instead of staying close to the shoreline. The hawk, however, does stay close to the shoreline. This finding demonstrates that
Biology
2 answers:
spin [16.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: This finding will demonstrate that an optimal foraging hypothesis based on maximizing caloric intake alone is probably incorrect.

Explanation:

The Optimal Foraging Theory is the theory which helps to predict the behavior of an animal in relation to its search for food. The above scenario is an example of the Optimal Foraging Theory.

Generally, food will provide calories and energy to an animal but searching and hunting the food will require both time and energy. Therefore, in order the the animal might maximize its strength, it will choose foraging method that will ensure that it gets the most out out of foraging.

Hence, the Hawk will prefer to save energy, in order that it might maximize the total energy that will be gained from capturing fish near the shoreline.

gulaghasi [49]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The findings demonstrates an optimal foraging hypothesis based on maximizing caloric intake alone is probably incorrect in this case.

Explanation:

This example can also be explained by optimal foraging theory which helps in predicting the behavior of an animal which it is searching for food. Food provides energy to the animal but searching and capturing the food requires both energy and time.

So in order to maximize fitness , an animal adopts a foraging strategy which provides the most benefit which in this case is energy, for the lower cost and by maximizing the net energy gained.

You might be interested in
Explain how parasitism differs from commensalism.
babymother [125]
<span>Commensalism is an interaction in which one of those species would benefit, and the other one would not be affected. Parasitism is an interaction in which one of those species would benefit at the expense of the host organism. Thus, in commensalism we have one positive and one neutral result while in parasitism we have one positive and one negative result.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these human activities do scientists consider the main cause of
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

I believe it is burning fossil fuels.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The electrostatic force that holds an ionic compound together like NaCI occur when
andrezito [222]

Answer:

please don't delete until i say so pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Explanation:

thank you. Ill give you point back if you dont

4 0
3 years ago
Please help me I don’t understand it.
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

1) bay - 0%

  cream - 0%

  buckskin - 100%

2) cream - 25%

    bay - 25%

   buckskin - 50%

3) co-dominance

Explanation:

Ok so a run down on Punnett Squares,  all you have to do is put the parent's genes on the top and right hand side and combine those two genes in the middle as I did in the picture.  Now, co-dominance, this basically means that there is no dominant allele.  For example, imagine a white flower (W) and a red flower (R).  If these two plants were to breed, you would get a pink flower (WR).  This means the red allele and the white allele are both co-dominant.  It is basically a combination of both genes that result in a mixed phenotype of the two genes, aka red and white makes pink.  This is also how you get an AB blood type.

I hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Use Darwin's theory of Natural Selection to explain the process by which the four-legged land animal, A, may have evolved, over
Len [333]

Answer:

Due to environmental conditions.

Explanation:

With the passage of time, environmental conditions change which causes the evolution of of four legged land animals from fish like creature. This change occurs due to change in environment. In water, there is no need for legs because fish moves with the help of fins and tail but the organisms that lives on land has legs in order to move from one place to another so we can say that change in the physical structure of organism occurs due to environment.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the benefit of doing group work in class? Are there any drawbacks?
    11·2 answers
  • A train travels 95 kilometers in 3 hours and then 55 kilometers in 2 hours. What is it’s average speed?
    11·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • How long does it take for earth to revolve around the sun one time?
    9·2 answers
  • Please help I'm stuck
    8·1 answer
  • How do planst respire? <br><br>this is due rllyyy soon please help me!
    8·1 answer
  • Which three steps describe how an animal obtains and uses energy for growth?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the ongoing death of a cell called
    13·1 answer
  • What is ecology and the functions​
    9·1 answer
  • Why would it be hard to outline the entire history of the United States on the geologic time scale?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!