At the equilibrium price p, we can solve for the quantity of goods x :
demand = supply
5200 - 0.0005x = 2800 + 0.0003x
2400 = 0.0008x
x = 3,000,000
With this quantity of goods, the equilibrium price is
p = 5200 - 0.0005 (3,000,000)
p = 5200 - 1500
p = 3700
if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1
Answer:
24 cm squared
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
(1, 3)
Step-by-step explanation:
2x + 3y = 11 ------------(i)
-4x + 2y = 2 ------------(ii)
Multiply equation (i) by 2.
(i)*2 4x + 6y = 22
(ii) <u>-4x + 2y = 2</u> {Now add and x will be eliminated}
8y = 24
y= 24/8
y = 3
Plugin the value of y in equation (i)
2x + 3*3 = 11
2x + 9 = 11
2x = 11-9
2x = 2
x = 2/2
x = 1
Well it would be 63$ if we are not including tax because 80-17=63
