The statement "And even now, /to crown my thoughts with acts, be it thought and done" supports the idea that Macbeth has decided to stop being indecisive and will take action immediate.
<h3>What is the story about?</h3>
The plot of William Shakespeare's Macbeth centers with Macbeth's life and his rise to power as a result of the three witches' prophecy of his supremacy in the kingdom.
And in his effort to obtain his desired position as king, he committed numerous heinous acts only to reach to the top, which also contributed to his demise.
The missing passage of the question is attached as an image.
The statement "And even now, /to crown my thoughts with acts, be it thought and done" supports the idea that Macbeth has decided to stop being indecisive and will take action immediate.
Thus, this can show the idea for not being indecisive and taking immediate action by Macbeth.
For more details regarding Macbeth, visit:
brainly.com/question/2456731
#SPJ1
Smart, they fight for the right to learn as girls , want equality and capable of doing a lot
The answer should be B.! I hope this helps!
In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
