Answer: He used persuasion and blame to control everyone.
Explanation: He persuaded people in Germany to trust him and he blamed Jews for the destruction of Germany during WW1.
Jimmy Cross blames himself for Kiowa's death because he followed orders and made camp in the field, even though it went against his instincts, which were to head for higher ground<span>.
Hope this helps :)</span>
Answer:
Illustration/example would go with Tells what something is; useful in all subjects
Classification/division would go with useful in Botany, biology, and anatomy classes
cause/effect would go with useful to describe how to refurnish furniture
extended definition would go with reasoning from several particular examples to establish a general principle.
inductive reasoning would go with drawing conclusions from implied information
deductive reasoning would go with fallacy in logic that assumes a cause and effect relationship because of sequence
inferences would go with drawing a particular conclusion from general premises
process analysis would go with structure used in history and science explaining reasons for certain events or phenomena
comparison/contrast would go with using a story to make a point
post hoc would go with reasoning from several particular examples to establish general principle
Explanation:
First, it's associated sometimes with highly contentious theories, such as Holocaust denial. Recall the public furor in response to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's 2007 speech at Columbia University, when he stated that the Holocaust didn't happen. Historians emphasize that people who deny the events of the Holocaust during World War II aren't practicing revisionist history but rather negationism. Another revisionism-related scandal occurred recently in Japan, also concerning World War II. The general of the Japanese air force authored an essay asserting that Japan was bullied into Pearl Harbor by the United States and only engaged in combat as a defensive measure. This brings up the issue of credibility that has marred the field of historical revisionism. The public tends to view revisionist theories of well-known historical incidents tied closely to its own lineage with more skepticism than those regarding more obscure events.
In the end, only a small quantity of revisionists histories are eventually accepted as fact.
