Answer:
The correct answer to this question is A) because resources are not equally good in each production activity.
Explanation:
PPS or Production possibility frontier ( which is often as production possibility curve ) shows the possible combinations( of two products or services) with maximum outputs that can be produced in an economy when all the available resources are fully and efficiently used.
The reason why opportunity cost is increased while moving along PPS is because when we increase the output of one good , that means we are allocating more resources towards this good ,that means we will be left with the fewer resources to carry out the production of other good , so therefore the opportunity cost would increase.
Answer:
$191,000.00
Explanation:
The cash amount of cash collected from customers is the amount of sales revenue in the year 2018 adjusted for changes in accounts receivable balances as shown by the formula below:
cash collected from customers=sales revenue+begining accounts receivable-ending accounts receivable
sales revenue=$202,000
the begining accounts receivable=$16,500
the ending accounts receivable=$27,500
It is expected that cash received would be sales less the increase in accounts receivable
cash collected from customers=$202,000+$16,500-$27,500
cash collected from customers=$191,000.00
Answer:
C. Matrix Organisation.
Explanation:
This is an organisation or work pattern where one/employee reports to more than one boss. It is used mainly in the management of large projects or product development processes, drawing employees from different functional disciplines for assignment to a team without removing them from their respective positions.
Employees in a matrix organization report on day-to-day performance to the project or product manager whose authority flows sideways (horizontally) across departmental boundaries.
Answer:
The correct answer is Legal.
Explanation:
A legal problem is a dispute that must be resolved within the framework of current law. When the same is submitted to a judge's decision, the obligation to motivate it is usually imposed. This requires defining the dispute based on the normative and factual statements that are introduced by the parties in the process, supported by hermeneutical consensus and / or evidence. When the judge has the full normative and factual information - and their respective interpretative and probative grounds -, he is in a position to formulate the problem. This then has a double component: the normative, which refers to the general aspect of the controversy and states the topic on which the debate will turn, and the factual one, which indicates the characteristics of the case that give the particular hermeneutical turn to the general theme.
Answer:
The correct option is A. Marginal thinking is best demonstrated by choosing to spend one more hour studying economics because you think the improvement in your score on the next quiz will be worth the sacrifice of time.
Explanation:
Marginal thinking can be described as a form of thinking in which a person evaluates the costs as well as the benefits of doing an extra task. The person thinks about the worth of the extra resources. For example, in the option A the person is thinking to study economics at the cost of an extra hour. This cost would benefit him to score more in the quiz which is worth the cost.