The correct answer is C; It is improper for Joe to assume these responsibilities as he may not sign documents using Dan's name.
Further Explanation:
Joe can't sign the attorneys name on any legal questions or documents on the titles. This is unethical as this is forgery since he isn't signing his own name. If Joe does sign off with the attorneys signature and the search was not correct then the attorney, Sally, and Joe will all be in legal trouble.
The attorney will have to review Sally's work and sign off on it. Since Joe is an attorney, he could actually sign his own name to these papers if it is within his job description and there would be no issues.
Learn more about paralegals at brainly.com/question/1878109
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
ANSWER:-
Both a state and federal court system
EXPLANATION:-
Mark me the brainliest !!!!!!
