<span>Constitution is the set of laws, rules and regulations of a country or an institution. The Constitution regulates and organizes the functioning of the State. It is the maximum law limiting powers and defines the rights and duties of citizens. No other law in the country may conflict with the Constitution.
In democratic countries, the constitution is drafted by a Constituent Assembly (belonging to the legislature), elected by the people. The Constitution can be amended and reforms, but they also have the immutable clauses (content that can not be abolished).
<span>I hope I was helpfull!</span></span>
In a procedure called random assignment, participants are placed in experimental conditions on the basis of chance, thus minimizing biases or preexisting differences in the groups.
Basically, the experimental condition is once the man of science manipulates the variable to assess its result on the variable. Below the experimental conditions, the participants receive experimental treatment whereas the participants within the control group don't receive any treatment.
Random assignment helps make sure that members of every group within the experiment area unit identical, which implies that the teams are doubtless a lot of representative of what's present within the larger population.
To learn more about Group here
brainly.com/question/15560909
#SPJ4
<span>The rivalry began between the Lakota and the Ojibwa because the Lakota were living in the Great Lakes region and the Ojibwa came there and started to move in. The Lakota became very upset with this decision. This disagreement between the two led to a major rivalry.</span>
Answer:
Option A: Appeal to unqualified authority
Explanation:
Fallacies of Weak Induction
This is said to take place only occurs the premises used as provided to support for a conclusion, but it is not enough to believe the conclusion.
Types of Fallacies of Weak Induction
1. Appeal to Unqualified Authority, 2. Appeal to Ignorance
3. Hasty Generalization
4. False Cause
5. Slippery Slope
6. Weak Analogy
Appeal to Unqualified Authority
In this type of appeal, an arguer used a statement made by another person as a form of evidence for a conclusion, and usually, that person is not qualified to to make such a statement. It is also defined as when the arguer appeals to an inappropriate or unqualified authority or expert as the basis for accepting a conclusion, therefore the viewpoint of such an individual that is raised is said to be logically irrelevant. It is only when an appeal to a legitimate expert such as eye-witness in court case etc. then it is a type of inductive argument.