1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anzhelika [568]
4 years ago
14

According to the supreme court why is the indian removal act unconstitutional

Social Studies
1 answer:
trapecia [35]4 years ago
7 0

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was deemed unconstitutional because white settlers had revoked the constitution of the Cherokee nation in Georgia, stating that Native Americans were subject to Georgia's state laws, not their own.

The Cherokee nation argued that they were an independent, or sovereign nation, so they were not subject to the laws of the state of Georgia. The Supreme Court agreed, saying that Georgia had no authority over the Cherokee people, who were a sovereign nation. The Cherokee people could only be subject to the authority of the federal government, not state or local.

Even though the Indian Removal Act was deemed unconstitutional, President Jackson disagreed and continued the policy of relocating tribes, stating that they were voluntary. History has shown that, in fact, there were forced removals under this act.

You might be interested in
Why is using military force the best choice of action? (whiskey rebellion)
aev [14]

Answer:

The Whiskey Rebellion was a 1794 uprising of farmers and distillers in western Pennsylvania in protest of a whiskey tax enacted by the federal government. Following years of aggression with tax collectors, the region finally exploded in a confrontation that resulted in President Washington sending in troops to quell what some feared could become a full-blown revolution. Opposition to the whiskey tax and the rebellion itself built support for the Republicans, who overtook Washington’s Federalist Party for power in 1802. The Whiskey Rebellion is considered one of the first major tests of the authority of the newly formed U.S. government.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
02 Multiple Choice
IRISSAK [1]
I think the answer is rivers.
8 0
3 years ago
Milgram's (1963) study on obedience deceived participants by having them think they were shocking someone, but the person was ac
Airida [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

Ethic standards are a set of guideline, principle or lay down rule within an organisation or any profession which acts as a footnote to all members to promote values, guide a person's and business's operational behaviour to avoid confusions during the course of their activities. Ethic standards or code differ from one organisation and institution to another. However, some ethical principles such as accountability, fairness, autonomy( consent), honesty, transparency etc are ethical principles perspective general to almost all organisation and institution.

Therefore from Milgram's study approach, it could be deduced that his method of research was based on misinformation and participants was not fully informed on the basic of the study conduct. Participants in any study must give their consent to any observation, participation before any study can be considered proper, legit or conducted in an appropriate manner.

<em>So, the study conducted by Milgram's would not likely be approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) today because the current ethical standards include having the researcher provide informed consent to participants before the study started, as well as to avoid causing any possible psychological harm to the participants and having incorrect data from such study.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
What are the major political parties? How do they affect elections?<br> will give brainliest
Yanka [14]

The Republican Party today is considered the more conservative party and Democrats tend to support plans that are more liberal. ... The candidates that run under these parties don't often win elections but do sometimes affect their outcomes by increasing or taking support away from a candidate from one of the main parties.


mark brainliest   :)

7 0
3 years ago
Findings from developmental science offer __________________ support for the assertion that immature rain development is respons
madreJ [45]

Answer:

a. mixed

Explanation:

Findings from developmental science offer mixed support for this theory, mainly due to the fact that the findings have shown both support for and against this theory. Therefore contradicting each other, which makes it impossible to prove this theory with the findings that already exist from the developmental science approach.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some similarities and differences between the loyalists and the patriots?
    6·1 answer
  • 2. Recall that Howie Mandel missed an important appointment because he kept returning home to make sure his door was locked. Obs
    5·1 answer
  • In what way was the structure of Mayan society similar to that of the early river civilizations?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the British support the new, independent nations of Latin America?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the rhyme scheme in this stanza in the passage battle of blenhiem
    14·1 answer
  • Estefan, 21, has had a series of unsuccessful romantic relationships. In each relationship, when his partner begins to ask about
    10·1 answer
  • Of the countries of north africa, only __________ does not have a strong farming sector.
    14·1 answer
  • Why were the Lincoln-Douglas debates important to Lincoln’s political career?
    11·2 answers
  • Why is making informed deicions important
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes Rome’s climate?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!