1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ymorist [56]
3 years ago
11

What difficulties might result if each State were not required to give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and ju

dicial proceedings of other States? Provide at least two examples to support your conclusion.
History
2 answers:
yaroslaw [1]3 years ago
8 0

Under Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, States <u>have to respect all public records, acts, and judicial proceedings.</u>

Thus we can conclude that this is done to ensure that states respect and honor each other state laws and court orders.

Were a State not required to uphold this Article, it would result in:

  1. States not enforcing clear actions and orders given by the courts of another state of law.
  2. A State indirectly imposing its own legislation on every other state.
g100num [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

What difficulties might result if each State were not required to give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of other States? Provide at least two examples to support your conclusion.

Explanation:

Under Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, States have to respect all public records, acts, and judicial proceedings.

Thus we can conclude that this is done to ensure that states respect and honor each other state laws and court orders.

Were a State not required to uphold this Article, it would result in:

States not enforcing clear actions and orders given by the courts of another state of law.

A State indirectly imposing its own legislation on every other state.

so this should be your answer

GOOD LUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You might be interested in
In the 1920's and 1930's some Americans used this statement to justify a policy of
blsea [12.9K]
I'm pretty sure the answer is B, isolationism.
7 0
4 years ago
Why does a.minimum wage exist?
LekaFEV [45]
Arguments in favour of a minimum wage mostly hang on the idea that firms have a responsibility to ensure that their workers earn enough to live on. If a firm can’t pay its workers enough to live on, then it isn’t a viable business, because it is dependent on wage subsidies. Of course “enough to live on” depends where you live: the cost of living in London is considerably higher than it is in, say, Newcastle, so a minimum wage that would give a reasonable standard of living in Newcastle is starvation level in London. The campaign for a voluntary Living Wage tries to persuade firms to pay above the current UK minimum wage, which is perceived as being below the real cost of living.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Through its committees congress ensures that the executive branch agencies are following the laws that it passed. What congressi
Andreyy89
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. The <span>congressional process that is being described would be its oversight function. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
In korematsu v. united states, the supreme court upheld which policy toward japanese americans
Sauron [17]

The Supreme Court upheld the policy of interning Japanese American citizens during World War II.

After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the US officially declared war on Japan. Shortly after this, the federal government was suspicious of Japanese American citizens and feared that many of them were spies for Japan. This is why president Franklin D. Roosevelt passed executive order 9066. This law resulted in the placing of Japanese American citizens into internment camps.

Korematsu was one of those citizens placed into an internment camp. He lated sued the federal government saying that this was a violation of his constitutional rights. However, the Supreme Court sided with the government as they felt that wartime actions can justify actions like the one taken by president Franklin D. Roosevelt.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
does anyone have all the answers for the final cumulative exam for history class in ednenuity???? I just got an 50 percent on my
denpristay [2]

Answer:

You should probably not be asking for answers on brainiest because you will get reported.

Also try looking back into the class you still have until the end of the semester to finish the class. Don't sweat it!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the 1920s, many_____were sponsored by the manufacturers of consumer products.
    7·2 answers
  • What founding documents are based upon the Magna Carta?
    5·1 answer
  • QUESTION 1
    5·1 answer
  • The period from 1789 to 1801 is known as the Federalist Era. Federalists were supporters of ratifying the Constitution. They bel
    15·1 answer
  • a student in the contemporary united states is researching the ancient roman city of pompeii, which was destroyed by a volcanic
    10·1 answer
  • How do the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness limit the powers of the government
    13·1 answer
  • 1) Describe the three "sections of the United States in 1850:
    15·1 answer
  • How did sea travel affect the lives of all ancient Greeks?
    13·1 answer
  • How do the cave paintings in Africa compare to cave paintings in other parts of the world?
    6·1 answer
  • Question 1 of 10
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!