That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
Women and africans arrived in greater numbers hope this helped :))
Answer: C. Limited governments tend to deal with protests and criticism harshly by imprisoning participants.
Explanation:
The limited government has limited powers and rights. This government includes the limited group of people, money, documents that are utilized by this government to run. It avails the right to vote to the public. For example, in India the center has more power then state. Some of the decisions taken by the state government are required to be approved by the union or center government. As a result of limited power execution some of the decisions necessary for the public are not taken by the government this is the reason for public protests and criticism. The protestors agitate for their freedom being imprison.
Answer Explanation:
Attorneys finds it more convenient to advocate for prosecutors or the police whom are believed to be upholding law and order in the society but may find it difficult to defend a guilty person against serious charges. But it is worthy to note that the failure of these attorneys to advocate for both parties can permit the law enforcement to trample on the liberty of anyone and everyone, even those that may be innocent.
The correct answer is <span>Variable ratio reinforcement schedule (VR)</span>
