Answer: This question lacks the following answers:
a. market share pricing
b. profit maximization
c. demand orientation
d. sales maximization
<u>The correct answer is b)</u>
Explanation:
The practice of giving away free things (mobile accessories) can be good after the launch of a new product range, or even when the company itself is entirely new. However, it is not feasible in the long run, as the company <u>does not generate profit</u> from giving products for free.
Giving discounts is definitely more lucrative, as the discount itself provides enough of an incentive for the customer to buy the accessory. On the company side, <em>profit </em>will be generated (although decreased with the discount, but still generated compared to giving free things).
Answer:
$372,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount to be reported in the balance sheet is shown below:
= Number of shares of common stock × fair value of the Papa stock on that date per share
= 6,200 shares × $60
= $372,000
Since in the question it is given that the Nana company does not have significant influence over Papa Company which means that the net income, retained earning, dividend is not be considered.
Therefore, the investment should be reported at the fair value
Answer:
The correct answer is option (C) $ 1,750
Explanation:
Given data:
Amount received from corporate bond = $ 2,200
Amount received from a savings account = $ 600
Thus, the total income = $ 2,200 + $ 600
or
The total income = $ 2800
Now,
the standard deduction for the person claimed as dependent's on another's tax return = $ 1,050
Hence, the total taxable income = Total income - standard deduction
or
the total taxable income = $ 2,800 - $ 1,050 = $ 1,750
Hence, the correct answer is option (C) $ 1,750
Answer:
- <em>As explained below, given that the score of the person is among the 0.03125 fraction of the best applicants, </em><u><em>he can count on getting one of the jobs.</em></u>
<em></em>
Explanation:
The hint is to use <em>Chebyshev’s Theorem.</em>
Chebyshev’s Theorem applies to any data set, even if it is not bell-shaped.
Chebyshev’s Theorem states that at least 1−1/k² of the data lie within k standard deviations of the mean.
For this sample you have:
- mean: 60
- standard deviation: 6
- score: 84
The number of standard deviations that 84 is from the mean is:
- k = (score - mean) / standar deviation
- k = (84 - 60) / 6 = 24 / 6 = 4
Thus, the score of the person is 4 standard deviations above the mean.
How good is that?
Chebyshev’s Theorem states that at least 1−1/k² of the data lie within k standard deviations of the mean. For k = 4, that is:
- 1 - 1/4² = 1 - 1/16 = 0.9375
- That means that half of 1 - 0.9375 are above k = 4: 0.03125
- Then, 1 - 0.03125 are below k = 4: 0.96875
Since there are 70 positions and 1,000 aplicants, 70/1,000 = 0.07. The compnay should select the best 0.07 of the applicants.
Given that the score of the person is among the 0.03125 upper fraction of the applicants, this person can count of geting one of the jobs.
Answer:
If the money decreases things will be more harder and more expensive to buy
Explanation:
Pretend you have $10 and something you want is $10 it is easier to buy it when the value of money is higher and if the money is lower than it'll be harder to get $10 to buy the item you want
