All categories

3 years ago

A limitation on the president’s power to appoint ambassadors is that

History

2 answers:

mylen [45]3 years ago

7 0

A limitation on the president’s power to appoint ambassadors is that the Senate must approve them.

Explanation:

The appointment of heads of departments, not being within the Constitution, has been controlled since the start of the government to come back below the supply as yet quoted, and to be subject to confirmation by the Senate. During early administrations, approval of President's cabinet appointments by the Senate was considered a basic formality.

insens350 [35]3 years ago

6 0

A limitation on the president’s power to appoint ambassadors is that the Senate must approve them.

Further Explanation:

The article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 of the constitution of United States of America grants power to the president of the country to appoint Ambassadors, council of Ministers, judges of Supreme Court and even officers of United States which are not constitutionally bounded. But all his appointments have must have the approval from Senate. President of United States can take any decision but requires approval of Senate for all of them. Decisions which are to be taken by President of United States in respect to war, Foreign policies and International relations don’t require approval of Senate. President is Commander in chief of Army, and Navy of United states. He has the powers to make treaties but for them also, approval and consent of Senate is required. President can advise senators in regards to any treaty but Senate is the final authority to make that treaty. Two third of the senators should be present to vote in the house in order to make treaties. The President has power to fill in the vacancies which may take place during the Recess period of Senate by granting them commissions which expires by the end of next season. In all in all the decisions related to appointments, Approval of Senate is required.

Learn more:

1. Supreme Court is best characterized as? brainly.com/question/4077152.

2. What happens if the house and senate versions of a bill are different? brainly.com/question/2560876

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Politics

Chapter: Presidential Powers

Keywords: President, United States of America, Senate, Powers of senators, appointments, army, Navy, Vacancies, Foreign policies, International Relations.

You might be interested in

Question 13 of 14

Nookie1986 [14]

Answer: I think it is C because that seems the most Likely

Explanation: tell me if im wrong :)

5 0

3 years ago

Does anyone know how was Pocahontas first treated by the Jamestown settlers after John Smith left?

lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

In real life Pocahontas was treated like a savage by the Jamestown settlers after Smith left because he got shot and ended up dieying. So Pocahontas ended up marring a noble rich man and became a well respected lady who had a long life till she died at the age of 35.

Explanation:

If you are talking about the Disney version let me know. :3

8 0

3 years ago

Why did the mughal emperor recognize the right of the british east india company to collect taxes on in northeast asia?

Elis [28]

Because they needed the protection of the East India Company (EIC) to preserve the Mughal authority. After one century of prosperity the Mughal empire was facing its own decline. Different emperors raise to throne and did very little to save the empire from its collapse.

They faced several fights among claimers to the throne and eventually civil war. Much of the Mughal treasures were looted. In response, the British from the EIC gained trading rights, such as collect taxes, and ultimately political power.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Explain how border areas of the west were affected by the mixture of people?

Ivenika [448]

The major way in which border areas of the west were affected by the mixture of people is that a plethora of immigrants from all over the world wanted to expand to the west in order to settle--meaning that people from all backgrounds often fought over land and job opportunities.

5 0

2 years ago

How does the author support her argument that some modern voting laws might be intended to prevent minorities from exercising th

OLga [1]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not mention the name of the text. Without the name of the text, we do not know what is included there.

However, trying to help you, we can comment on the following.

There is a text titled "The Voting Rights Act of 1965." If that is the case, we can say the following.

The author of this text refers to that legislation passed in the mid-sixties and says that there are laws that were passed to limit American minorities to exert their vote in elections. Of course, the author not only refers to African Americans, but to Hispanic people or Asian people.

In the case of African Americans, the author includes a series of legislation that had been passed in different states to limit their civil rights despite federal legislation.

8 0

2 years ago