The early mapmakers really had it very hard to create a proper map, as they didn't had any of the modern technology that nowadays we do. They had to rely on their orientation in the space, be able to properly adjust the distances, using only their eyes and brains. Also, they were putting into the maps areas that were told and described by them by people that were there, but they personally haven't even seen the place. The knowledge they had about the size of the world was very limited, as they were not really able to travel that much during their lifetime.
Their interpretation is usually relatively good and relatively accurate considering the circumstances. Of course there were some misjudged distances and proportions, but not by far. Since they only new so much of the world, they usually were making the map, thus the size of the world, from the eastern most location they new, to the westernmost location they new, either putting straight lines like that is the end of the world, or putting waters to mark the same.
The right answer is “show the wealth of patrons”. In the Renaissance, a patron was a wealthy person who sponsored an artist for their work. For example, the Medici Family was one of those, they were a famous family from Florence who ruled and supported of the arts. Lorenzo the Magnificent, a famous member of it, is well-known for sponsoring Italian artists such as Michelangelo and Botticelli.
Answer: i would do the last one because seem best for the answer
Explanation:
<span>Amending the U.S. Constitution is, by design, a very difficult process. Since the adoption of the Bill of Rights – the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, ratified in 1791 – only 17 amendments have cleared the hurdles necessary to be codified in the nation's founding document, the last of which was ratified in 1992. There are four ways to amend the Constitution, though only two have ever been used</span>
Later crusades marched to Egypt to <span>support the Kingdom of Jerusalem by targeting the danger.</span>
