There are two ways to evaluate the square root of 864: using a calculator, and simplifying the root.
The first method is simplifying the root. While this doesn't give you an exact value, it reduces the number inside the root.
Find the prime factorization of 864:
Take any number that is repeated twice in the square root, and move it outside of the root:
The simplified form of √864 will be 12√6.
The second method is evaluating the root. Using a calculator, we can find the exact value of √864.
Plugged into a calculator and rounded to the nearest hundredths value, √864 is equal to 29.39. Because square roots can be negative or positive when evaluated, this means that √864 is equal to ±29.39.
Answer:
But the graph paper is not here...
3/8 + 5/2
=3/8 + 20/8
= 23/8
or
= 2 7/8
Equation 1 :
| 5x - 6 | = -41.....no solution because an absolute vlue cannot equal a negative number
equation 2 :
| 7x + 13 | = 27...2 solutions
C. equation 2 has more solutions then equation 1.
Using <u>linear function concepts</u>, it is found that the correct option is:
The amount of calories in a cheeseburger increases by 1.42 for every one gram of fat. The calorie amount estimated by this model is 121 if there are zero grams of fat.
A linear function is modeled by:
In which:
- m is the slope, which represents by how much y changes when x changes by 1.
- b is the y-intercept, which is the value of y when x = 0.
In this problem:
- The explanatory variable fat is the input.
- The response variable calories is the output.
The equation is:
- The slope is of 1.42, which means that the amount of calories increases by 1.42 when the amount of fat increases by 1 gram.
- The y-intercept is of 121, which means that if there are 0 grams of fat, there will be 121 calories.
Thus, the correct option is:
The amount of calories in a cheeseburger increases by 1.42 for every one gram of fat. The calorie amount estimated by this model is 121 if there are zero grams of fat.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/16302622
