Answer: Implies that the government is restricted by law.
The recommended plan to be enacted to create a method of redistricting for competitive legislature races in Texas would <u>ensure the inclusion </u>of subject-matter experts in the legislature.
<h3>What is redistricting?</h3>
Redistricting is commonly defined as the process of <u>redrawing district boundaries</u> to guarantee equal voter representation.
Gerrymandering has been practiced for too long without good results. My plan would favor the inclusion of more subject-matter experts in the Texas legislature. This would improve legislative performance and outcomes.
Learn more about redistricting at brainly.com/question/7504797
Answer:
endanger themselves with a risky but agreed-upon plan
Explanation:
Groupthink refers to a social phenomenon that make people conform to a certain action just because they desire harmony/comformity within the group rather than because of logical reasons.
This often happen in an organization with strict implementation of hierarchy like the army. In the army, the decisions from Superiors are absolute. So, whenever the superiors told the subordinates to follow a bad strategy, most subordinates will keep their mouth shout most likely agree to it since they fear that other peers might view them as uncooperative or a coward.
If a family has one child enrolled in Diane's Day Care Center, it costs $75 per week. If a family has two children enrolled at Diane's, it costs $135. Diane's is using an quantity differential.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A differentiated price is a way to charge various prices for the similar kind of product and to the quantities of same number from various customers depending on the form of the product, payment criteria, delivery time, customer segment and so on.
In analytical and economics, the variation is on a scale of two values. In simple, the difference is the variation between things, especially wages. From, this, concluding that Diane uses the quantity differential for her Day care centre.
Supporters of the plural executive structure rely on two main arguments in favor of it, which are protection against abuses of power by elected officials and also the position that this arrangement is more democratic.
The plural executive structure corresponds to the power distributed to more than one official elected by the citizens as head of state.
Therefore, the argument of the defenders of this arrangement is in respect of increased cooperation and trust between the executive and legislative powers, limitation of power and increased responsibility towards the population.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/5039460
