Please don’t ignore..What was the result of Indian contact with the Persians and Greeks, and what were the

History

1 answer:

kicyunya [14]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation :

Due to rich and abundant wealth in India, both the Persians and Greeks at different times moved to India to explore its resources and trading activities. In the process, they had so many effects in the region and among its people. Some of the effects of India's contact with Persia includes the annexation of part of Punjab and the Sindh region, also there was the enrolment of many Indians into the Achaemenid army. In other areas, it also led to trading activities between the Persian and Indians, and consequently, there was also the formation of a writing style greatly influenced by the Persian in India. It was known as kharoshthi.

On the other hand, the Greeks also had an effect on India through their contacts, some of which are: leading to European contacts with the Indians, through trading routes created by Alexander of Macedonia. At the same time, it led to the unification of northwestern India. In other areas, the Greeks artistry was combined with the natives which resulted in the establishment of Gandhara School of art. While Indians were able to learn the art of making gold and silver coins as well.

Lastly, while there was the unification of India under the Mauryan Empire particularly under Chandragupta. The consequences were that during the rule of Ashoka, the grandson of Chandragupta, who was converted to Buddhism, he actively facilitated the expanse of the religion over the region of India and its reaches.

You might be interested in

The vocal emphasis placed on a spoken word or word part is called

nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

tumder

Explanation:

sikorski tadic frisk deryck gein

5 0

3 years ago

Describe at least 2 “justification ideologies” for imperialism from the prescribed examples of cultural, racial, and religious m

STALIN [3.7K]

Answer: The imperialists considered individual nations incapable of developing on their own. They emphasized that Catholicism would raise peoples to a more civilizational level, and eliminate primitive religious beliefs.

Explanation:

Some historians characterize imperialism as one of the most brutal episodes in the history of the human race. The imperialists, on the other hand, sought to defend their actions by expressing several views. They rightly pointed out that individual societies are not capable of developing their economy on their own, and that they are not produced in this respect. They felt that their activities could improve the economic situation in non-developed countries. Considering that many countries that were victims of imperialism were underdeveloped, the imperialists emphasized that by adopting new technologies, they would improve the productivity of that society. When the Spaniards came to American territory, rumours began to emerge of cannibalism being prevalent among particular nations. They then sent Catholic missionaries outraging the process by intending to raise the awareness of these nations to a higher level. They also emphasized that the beliefs of these peoples were primitive and that Catholicism would influence these peoples to reach a higher civilization level.

5 0

3 years ago

What effect has the due process clause of the 14th amendment has on the bill of rights?

QveST [7]

the 5th and the 14th amendment to the united states constitution each contain a due process clause

5 0

3 years ago

What was the Great Compromise and how did it compare to the Virginia and New Jersey Plans?

Elis [28]

The Great Compromise (Or the Connecticut Compromise of July 16, 1787) was a compromise began by Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, in which it was stablished a Congress representation bicameral system, compound of the Senate and the House of Representatives, where in the Senate it'd be assigned an equal seats number by state, but in the House of Representatives, there would be assigned a seats number according to each state population proportion.

And the Great Compromise was compared to the Virginia and New Jersey Plans, because that Compromise arised from a disccordance between the Virginia Plan (Or the James Maddison's plan) and the New Jersey Plan (Or the Paterson’s New Jersey Plan) that were presented in the Convention of May 14 to September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Moreover, the Virginia Plan proposed important changes in the Congress structure, stablishing a Bicameral system, but by other side the New Jersey plan was based in the confederation articles, stablishing an Unicameral congress System, so to resolve those diferences, on June 11, 1787, Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth proposed the Connecticut Compromise, where were included proposals from both plans.

5 0

3 years ago

What measures did the Radical Republicans take to make Reconstruction harder for the white South?

blondinia [14]

The radical republicans with open arms invited Johnson but after they realized he was gonna follow in lincolns footsteps they turned on him. They mad it as hard as it could be to pass anything and they were going to have him impeached but he didn't get impeached because of one vote

8 0

3 years ago