Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
A judicial notice is defined as a rule concerning recognition not evidence by a court where a fact that is very well known and attested that there is no room for doubting the fact.
There is no need for formal presentation of evidence.
I'm the given scenario the plaintiff produced three well-known chemistry texts containing explanations of the formula and asked the court to take judicial notice of the formula for the compound.
Since the formula is well known and even contained in well known chemistry texts, the court should take judicial notice of the formula
Answer:
Materials handling Allocation= $27.5
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Each chair consists of 10 separate parts totaling $165 direct materials and requires 5.0 hours of machine time to produce.
Materials handling= $2.75 per part
Machining= $5.00 per machine hour
Assembling= $1.50 per part
Packaging= $3.75 per finished unit
Material Handling allocation base is: Number of parts.
Allocation= 10 parts* $2.75= $27.5
Freedom of ownership is part of the government and the public sector business environment.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Freedom of ownership or a sharing vision offers a number of opportunities in the business environment. It allows the government to control the costs, generate the economies of scale and bargain costs down internally.
The freedom of ownership permits access to complex, specialized skills that can not be sourced locally. So this allows the government sector or the public sector environment to run the business successfully and to run it efficiently.
Answer:
2.27%
; 61.54%
Explanation:
Given that,
Sales/Total assets = 2.2x
Return on assets (ROA) = 5%
Return on equity (ROE) = 13%
Therefore,
Return on assets = Profit margin × Assets turnover
0.05 = Profit margin × 2.2
Profit margin = 0.05 ÷ 2.2
Profit margin = 0.0227 or 2.27%
Percent of total assets is from equity:
= Return on assets ÷ Return on equity
= 0.05 ÷ 0.13
= 0.3846 or 38.46%
Hence, the debt is as follows:
Debt = Assets - equity
= 1 - 0.3846
= 0.6154 or 61.54%
Answer:
- The richest quintile has the ability to save a larger percentage of its income.
- Individuals experiencing temporary fluctuations in their incomes are more likely to maintain moderate spending habits.
Explanation:
First part of this question reads:
In the United States, the richest quintile of the population receives 13 times as much income as the poorest quintile. However, the richest quintile only spends 4 times as much as the poorest quintile.
The richest quantile can afford to save more than the poorest quantile because they get enough income to manage their daily needs and then save. The poorest quantile on the other hand face a daily struggle and so have to spend all or most of their income to survive.
When the richer quantile goes through temporary fluctuations, they maintain moderate spending because they know it is temporary and so they keep saving. This is not the case for the poorer quantiles who have to spend according to their income - regardless of its fluctuating - to survive.
