I believe that the answer for this is option B. Since there is an advocate given for a limited government, this would most likely contradict the modern American bureaucracy for the reason that the shift of bureaucracy is too much that the federal power between the President to the Congress becomes imbalance.
Calvin Coolidge's economic policies during the early 1920s helped people forget about the teapot dome scandal.
<h3>What was the teapot dome scandal?</h3>
This was the Bribery scandal that had to do with the president of the United States at the time.
The president was Warren Harding. It was an oil reserve scandal that took place in Wyoming.
Read more on Calvin Coolidge here: brainly.com/question/1799809
#SPJ1
Considering a point of view it is fair to say that Mr. Ellsberg attacked democracy itself by disclosing the private study. From Ellsberg's view he took it upon himself to inform the public about a crucial issue namely, that the study showed, in his opinion, that the American government had been lying for years about the progress of the war The Pentagon Papers leak may have compromised national security, but only by showing the rest of the world that the US was incapable of keeping its secrets.
Extent to which government should be allowed to have secrecy:
Governmental secrecy has a peculiar quality that results from the lack of a known mechanism for limiting its exercise to specific areas on which reasonable people can agree.
The cost of secrecy extends beyond the spread of mistrust that the government is abusing the public's confidence. It also serves as a means of halting the national discourse in which citizens prepare themselves for important decisions that may require significant sacrifice. The Pentagon Papers serve as the best example of this.
Learn more about Pentagon Papers here:
brainly.com/question/2995313
#SPJ1
Out of the choices given, the one NOT true about Napoleon Bonaparte was that he established democratic governments in the countries he conquered. The correct answer is C.
Answer:
The system of checks and balances is an important part of the Constitution. With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. Without checks and balances one branch would be too overpowered.
Explanation:
