The answer is "jumping to conclusions".
Jumping to conclusions is a mental term alluding to a correspondence snag where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having every one of the actualities; to achieve unjustifiable conclusions". As it were, "the point at which I neglect to recognize what I watched direct from what I have just gathered or assumed". Because it includes settling on choices without having enough data to make sure they are correct, this can offer ascent to terrible or impulsive choices.
Answer:
The answer is <u>It assumes that the conscious blocking, or repression, of disturbing thoughts and impulses is at the heart of all maladaptive childhood behavior</u>
Explanation:
Psychoanalysis is a treatment process based on the therioes of Sigmud Freud which helps an recover from negative and distructive behaviours as a result of his or her deep seated and repressed experiences. This repressed experiences might been forgotten by the person but it indirectly affects the behaviour of the individual in question.
An example, is the experience of nearly drowning in water by a pateint during childhood. At adult age, the person would be afriad of water but not knowing that his or her phobia for water was as a result of the bad experience he or she had during childhood.
Answer:
Path Goal Theory
Explanation:
The Path Goal Theory can best be thought of as a procedure where leaders pioneers select explicit practices that are most appropriate to the employee's requirements and the workplace with the goal that they may best direct the employee's through their path in the acquisition of their day by day work exercises.
In view of the above mentioned Path Goal Theory, alludes to how a leader pioneer impact subordinates' impression of both work goals and individual objectives and the connections found between these arrangements of goals.
The theory clearly concerns the influence of leaders on the perception of their sub-ordinates of their work objectives and the path followed so as to attain those objectives.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. There are few theories on why the books of Maccabees are not part of Jewish scriptures.
The first one is the date; it is believed that the Council of Jamnia only took books that existed for a long time and were unofficially considered canonical when canonizing Hebrew Bible. The events in the old testament go from the Creation to the book of Esther, happening during the rebuilding of the Temple. For them, The Maccabean Revolt was the recent event, happening after these mentioned ones.
The more probable reason, however, lies in the separation of Judaism on two fractures – <em>the Pharisees</em> and<em> theSadducees</em>. While Pharisees lean towards ideas of oral law and tradition, Sadducees reject them and follow the written Torah as the only canon. The Maccabees are believed to be descendant from Pharisees, and quite possibly excluded from canonization by a council of Jamnia because of this reason.
However, the books of Maccabees are still valuable historical account, the one because of which Hanukah is celebrated.
2. Because of the evidence presented above, the answer is - Yes, it is true that the first and second Maccabee books were written as part the Jewish history.
Southern states were known as the cotton kingdom because the cotton population in the south was rapidly growing. Rich plantation owners would grow cotton and sell them to the New England region to make clothes etc.
