Question: The Founders of the United States gave much consideration to the division of responsibility between federal and state governments. They strove to strike a balance between an overbearing central government (such as the British government that had ruled them before the Revolution) and an over reliance on local governments (such as the structure of US government under the Articles of Confederation). Many citizens today continue to debate the correct balance between federal and state government.
What is your position? Name some areas of conflict where you think the powers are improperly balanced. Name some areas where you think the balance works well.
Explanation:
When the framers designed the US Constitution they did not give the Federal government much power so power was balanced between States and Central Government. But the Federal government has gained more and more power over time. At the same time, the States were restricted over the years, when the Framers did not imagine doing so. Both of these situations can be good or bad.
For example, making the States respect the Bill of Rights was a good thing when individuals had their basic rights stripped on a State level. So making only the Federal government respect the Bill of Rights did not make much sense. At the same time, the Federal Government has shown much power that was not designed and showed a few issues over the years, especially with the Executive Branch that had in a few opportunities overstepped its powers.
Answer:
Theory
Explanation:
A theory is a logical explanation supported by fact.
According to <span>Richard Dawkins, culture is a population of memes which are just "copy me" programs.
Just as genes reproducing themselves, memes are actions, behaviors, units of culture that are replicated through language or observation.
This way of describing culture has some important ramifications:
first, culture is not a way of thinking that a certain population share, but in opposition is something we have in common with people with our same culture;
second, where an individual experiment some degree of conflict between the cultural norms and its belief, this conflict is not caused by an external force but instead is a conflict that is taking place in their heads;
third, if you view culture as a similarity between people, like brown hair, it is much easier to remember that perspective matters;
lastly, this way of viewing culture gives us a measurable way of thinking about how culture is spread among different individuals.
</span>
Answer:
d. Aquinas’s use of dialectical method.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. Aquinas’s lack of faith in God.
b. Aquinas’s deliberate imitation of liturgical practice.
c. Aquinas’s insistence that his readers accept revealed truth.
d. Aquinas’s use of dialectical method.
The main thing that this statement from Aquinas shows is that he employs the dialectical method. The dialectical method, or simply, dialectics, is a method that attempts to mimic discourse between two people who hold different points of view. When using this system, it is assumed that both people want to establish the truth about a matter through reasonable and sound arguments. In this example, Aquinas is employing it in order to get to the truth of whether there is a God.
<span>Drunk drivers kill two to four times more people than aggressive drivers. This is FALSE. It is the aggressive drivers.</span>
