Answer:
<h3>Option B, Pizza consumption and death are related somehow, but a correlational study is not able to reveal any kind of causal relationship. </h3>
Explanation:
A causal relation between two events exists if the occurrence of the first causes an effect to the other. Here, the notion of cause and effect is the primary base to find a relation between events.
The statement that consumption of pizza leads to death is not a direct study which was found after studying the measure or degree of relationship between pizza and death. The investigators in this study found a correlation between pizza consumption and death only over a 10-year period. There may be circumstances like age, health, etc. which might have secured a relation between the two when studied for a long period of time. But that does not mean there is a causal relationship between the two.
A correlation between two events does not necessarily imply causation. It can mean a prediction without a real causation. A causal relation should have an immediate cause and effect result between two events or variables to have a causal relationship.
Answer:
c.
Explanation:
the answer is c because the "lobbyist" usually can get votes needed to win an election, with conditions In place. example: a lobbyist on the Republican side influences their supporters to vote on a law to raise taxes.
Collection of the facts to determine whether injustices
exist;negotiation;self-purification;and direct actionhere you go i had
to do this for a class :] thought id help you out good luck(he forgot
collecting funds)
That statement is false
According to conflict theorists, there would never be a perfect society where every individual have an exact social standing. No religious establishments can change the situation.
People would always be in a constant state of competition in because we have to compete for a limited amount of resources in the society. Those who obtain most resources would be the one that have higher social standing and able to secure their survival.
