Answer:
The test statistic is z = -2.11.
Step-by-step explanation:
Before finding the test statistic, we need to understand the central limit theorem and subtraction of normal variables.
Central Limit Theorem
The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean
and standard deviation
, the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean
and standard deviation
.
For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.
Subtraction between normal variables:
When two normal variables are subtracted, the mean is the difference of the means, while the standard deviation is the square root of the sum of the variances.
Group 1: Sample of 35, mean of 1276, standard deviation of 347.
This means that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1481/f1481095e9d5cfb9bc5e84d05038b75801eba61a" alt="\mu_1 = 1276, s_1 = \frac{347}{\sqrt{35}} = 58.6537"
Group 2: Sample of 35, mean of 1439, standard deviation of 298.
This means that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/414a3/414a327508afdcbf7d0033be15a78fcf0a699a02" alt="\mu_2 = 1439, s_2 = \frac{298}{\sqrt{35}} = 50.3712"
Test if there is a difference in productivity level.
At the null hypothesis, we test that there is no difference, that is, the subtraction is 0. So
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1902e/1902efcbbbbb84dcbfa42124ff4da7c50d7d3f15" alt="H_0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0"
At the alternate hypothesis, we test that there is difference, that is, the subtraction is different of 0. So
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fcf6/8fcf65f8ddc06e5266473ba494c16d6d9a2c2059" alt="H_1: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \neq 0"
The test statistic is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a65a1/a65a1bbbf85a9ad61d30d9f528b8cc9552bad72b" alt="z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}"
In which X is the sample mean,
is the value tested at the null hypothesis and s is the standard error.
0 is tested at the null hypothesis:
This means that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/071ef/071ef6e5a20d3616ed0415a9d7e890471807b8b3" alt="\mu = 0"
From the two samples:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/448fc/448fc21449095128bdd8e15406baeb7749beb78d" alt="X = \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 1276 - 1439 = -163"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a30af/a30af225216d044790303bdb1e61a67da178b100" alt="s = \sqrt{s_1^2+s_2^2} = \sqrt{58.6537^2+50.3712^2} = 77.3144"
Test statistic:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a65a1/a65a1bbbf85a9ad61d30d9f528b8cc9552bad72b" alt="z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bff01/bff01fd7b28c64cc7399a7485d055b65f2b9cf1b" alt="z = \frac{-163 - 0}{77.3144}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ef22/8ef22d7e6be87154f9e55e1ec758957e4f5b3734" alt="z = -2.11"
The test statistic is z = -2.11.
1.8, Problem 37: A lidless cardboard box is to be made with a volume of 4 m3
. Find the
dimensions of the box that requires the least amount of cardboard.
Solution: If the dimensions of our box are x, y, and z, then we’re seeking to minimize
A(x, y, z) = xy + 2xz + 2yz subject to the constraint that xyz = 4. Our first step is to make
the first function a function of just 2 variables. From xyz = 4, we see z = 4/xy, and if we substitute
this into A(x, y, z), we obtain a new function A(x, y) = xy + 8/y + 8/x. Since we’re optimizing
something, we want to calculate the critical points, which occur when Ax = Ay = 0 or either Ax
or Ay is undefined. If Ax or Ay is undefined, then x = 0 or y = 0, which means xyz = 4 can’t
hold. So, we calculate when Ax = 0 = Ay. Ax = y − 8/x2 = 0 and Ay = x − 8/y2 = 0. From
these, we obtain x
2y = 8 = xy2
. This forces x = y = 2, which forces z = 1. Calculating second
derivatives and applying the second derivative test, we see that (x, y) = (2, 2) is a local minimum
for A(x, y). To show it’s an absolute minimum, first notice that A(x, y) is defined for all choices
of x and y that are positive (if x and y are arbitrarily large, you can still make z REALLY small
so that xyz = 4 still). Therefore, the domain is NOT a closed and bounded region (it’s neither
closed nor bounded), so you can’t apply the Extreme Value Theorem. However, you can salvage
something: observe what happens to A(x, y) as x → 0, as y → 0, as x → ∞, and y → ∞. In each
of these cases, at least one of the variables must go to ∞, meaning that A(x, y) goes to ∞. Thus,
moving away from (2, 2) forces A(x, y) to increase, and so (2, 2) is an absolute minimum for A(x, y).