How do you solve 1/18 - 1/30 using prime factorization

frozen [14]

Answer:

strong negative linear correlation
-0.986

Step-by-step explanation:

You need to notice that when altitude goes up, temperature goes down. That means the correlation is negative.

The table shows the temperature decrease to be monotonic (nowhere does it go up when altitude increases), so the correlation is strong.

The strong negative correlation number available to you is -0.986.

___

If you want confirmation, you can put the numbers into your favorite graphing calculator and tell it to compute the correlation for you.

4 0

3 years ago

How do I multiply 89 x 38 by using partial products? PLEASE ANSWER FAST

olga_2 [115]

Answer:

The result after partial products of 89 x 38 is 3382

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to solve 89 x 38 using partial products.

In Partial products we divide each term such that 89 can be written as 80 and 9 while 38 can be written as 30 and 8

We will multiply each term with other and then find their sum.

Multiplication is shown in figure attached.

Now adding the results of each cell in the table:

2400+640+270+72= 3382

So, the result after partial products of 89 x 38 is 3382.

Learn More:

You can learn more about partial products at:

brainly.com/question/10666510

brainly.com/question/4282963

brainly.com/question/13174282

Keywords: Partial products, product

#learnwithBrainly

5 0

3 years ago

This question is not that hard but I’m getting rushed

Vsevolod [243]

14:21 one is the right answer

4 0

2 years ago

Plant A: A graph has time (weeks) on the x-axis, and height (inches) on the y-axis. A line goes through points (0, 3), (1, 4.8),

butalik [34]

Answer:

The correct option is;

No, The greater rate of change of Plant A will result in it being 0.9 inches taller in 6 weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

The parameters given are;

Plant A:

Weeks, Height

0, 3

1, 4.8

2, 6.6

3, 8.4

The rate of change of height, H per week, t, $\left (\dfrac{dH}{dt} \right )$ for plant A per week is therefore;

$\dfrac{dH}{dt} = \dfrac{H_n - H_{(n-1)} }{t_n - t_{(n-1)}} = \dfrac{8.4 - 3 }{3 - 0} = \dfrac{5.4}{3} = 1.8 \ inches/week$

Therefore we have;

H = 1.8 × t + 3

At week 6,

H = 3 + 6×1.8 = 13.8 inches

Plant B

Weeks, Height

2, 7.3

3, 8.7

4, 10.1

The rate of change of height, H per week, t, $\left (\dfrac{dH}{dt} \right )$ for plant B per week is given as follows;

$\dfrac{dH}{dt} = \dfrac{H_n - H_{(n-1)} }{t_n - t_{(n-1)}} = \dfrac{10.1 - 7.3 }{4 - 2} = \dfrac{2.8}{2} = 1.4 \ inches/week$

Therefore we have;

When t = 2, H = 7.3 hence, 7.3 = 2 × 1.4 + H₀

Where:

H₀ = H at t = 0

H₀ = 7.3 - 2 × 1.4 = 4.5

At week 6 we have;

H = 4.5 + 6×1.4 = 12.9 inches

Which indicates that Plant A will be 0.9 inches taller than Plant B at week 6.

The correct option is therefore;

No, The greater rate of change of Plant A will result in it being 0.9 inches taller in 6 weeks.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the vertical asymptotes of the function f(x) = the quantity of 2 x plus 8, all over x squared plus 5 x plus 6?

lutik1710 [3]

You'd find the vertical asymptotes by seeing where the denominator equals zero; you can do so by factoring the denominator.
In this case, you can factor the denominator into (x+3)(x+2), so if you set each of those equal to zero you can find the equations of the vertical asymptotes (x=-3 and x=-2).

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers