Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is Since 0 in ln(3x) - 0 is not a logarithm, the property of logarithms cannot be used here.
The difference shown cannot be written as a quotient of logarithms.
The step ln(x2) = ln(3x) - (0) reduces to
ln(x2) = ln(3x).
The possible solutions are 0 and 3, with 0 being extraneous.
Answer:
I believe the answer is b.
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes.
Answer:
585856859686
Step-by-step explanation:
546786676
Answer:
738
Step-by-step explanation:
Start by multiplying..
23 x 33 = 759
Next subtract..
759 - 21 = 738
<h2>
<u>Final answer is 738</u></h2>
Answer:
the third one
Step-by-step explanation:
