A. undefined because the line is horizontal
X + Y = 50
X = Y + 6
X = 28
Y = 22
28 + 22 = 50
28 - 22 = 6 (28= 22 + 6)
There are 28 students in the larger class.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
The answer is B because its 9 hundred and thousandths is the smallest place
- Pressure
- Gravity
hope this helps :D