Answer:
1010010001
Step-by-step explanation:
Keep dividing 657 by 2, and record the quotient and remainder
657
328,1
164,0
82,0
41,0
20,1
10,0
5,0
2,1
1,0
So chain the remainders from bottom up to get the binary number:
1010010001
Check:
1+16+128+512=657 checks.
Answer:
A. The y-intercept of g(x) is less than the y-intercept of f(x).
Step-by-step explanation:
The x-intercept, or when x = 0, of f(x) is -4, the x-intercept of g(x) is -8, so g(x) are neither greater nor equal to f(x), this marks out C and D. The y-intercept, or when y = 0, is in this case f(x) or g(x). The y-intercept of f(x) is 16, the y-intercept of g(x) is 4, so the y-intercept of g(x) is not equal to the y-intercept of f(x), this marks out B. Now to check A, 4 < 16, so y-intercept of g(x) < y-intercept of f(x), the answer is A
<span>1/4(x + 16) - x =
First, distribute the 1/4.
= 1/4x + 1/4 * 16 - x
= 1/4x + 4 - x
= 1/4x + 4 - 4/4x
= 1/4x - 4/4x + 4
= -3/4x + 4

</span>
Answer:
(a). $35746. (b). Higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
(a). Given that the least-squares regression equation is y = 7163x + 14242. Also, in the question above we are given that y is the median income and x is the percentage of 25 years and older with at least a bachelor's degree in the region, that is to say that the value of x = 30.
Therefore, y = 7163x + 14242.
y = (7163 × 30) + 14242.
y = $35746.
(b). The condition for our x is; 28.7 percent of adults 25 years and older have at least a bachelor's degree.
Then, y = (7163 × 28.7) + 14242.
y = $34814.
Hence, we have the median income in this region = $38,163 HIGHER than $34814.
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
m= (y-y1)/(x-x1)
Points are (-10, -20) and (1, -9)
m= (-20+9)/(-10-1)= (-11)/(-11)= 1
m=1 to replace ? mark