1 unit to the left of -1 on the number line is -2.
Thus, 7 units to the left of -1 is -8.
The appropriate choice is ...
... c. -8
Answer:
C) As x approaches positive infinity, f(x) approaches positive infinity
Step-by-step explanation:
- The domain is NOT all real numbers as x is either smaller than or bigger than 0, and smaller than or bigger than 2. So x ≠ 0 and x ≠ 2.
- This implies that there are asymptotes at x=0 and x=2.
Therefore, the function is NOT continuous.
- The function is NOT increasing over its entire domain as
f(x) = -x² -4x + 1 is decreasing for its given domain of 0<x<2
Since we need a point that divides K-->J into two segments in a 1:3 ratio, let's flip it to a 3:1 ratio in the J-->K direction. That means that this point is 3/(3+1) = 3/4 of the way up line JK.
Let's take 3/4 of the x of K (plus the 1 for the x of J):
3/4×(9 - 1) + 1 (because the beginning ofvthe line, at J, has an x of 1)...
3/4×(8) + 1 = 6 + 1 = 7
Therefore the answer is C) 7
Answer:
H0: p = 0.078
Ha: p ≠ 0.078
Step-by-step explanation:
The researchers say that the rate is about 7.8%, or 0.078 as a decimal. That makes that the null hypothesis because using "is" in math is the same as saying "equals" and the null hypothesis always has the statement of equality in it. The reason there is a not equals to sign in the alternate is for this reason as well. The researchers say it is about that amount, not more or less than that amount. So it makes this a 2 tailed test. If the amount is significantly higher or lower, then we might have to reject the null hypothesis depending on the outcome of the test.
How someone supposed to know what the table looks like..... at least add the table
