<span><span>Checking accounts: best for unrestricted access to funds; typically worst for earning interest.
</span><span>
Savings accounts: good for earning some interest with quick access to funds.
</span><span>
Money market accounts: can have higher interest than savings accounts, plus some check-writing and ATM access.
</span><span>
Certificates of deposit (CDs): highest interest rates in exchange for most-limited access to funds</span></span>
Answer:
Investment Opportunity 1 has a few risks.Though it invests in stocks, it makes consistent profits. It lacks volatility because managers carefully select stocks with long-term earning potential. Investment Opportunity 2 risks are related to changing interest rates, which can cause bonds to make less money for bondholders. Also, it may be affected by inflation, and it carries the risk of default: if a city or county government fails to make its bond payments, then the bondholder loses money. Both companies tell you the risks, and they have the same level of it. Investment Opportunity 1 has three documents to illustrate the fund’s risks and returns over the past five years.The first graph lists how a hypothetical investment of $10,000 fared over those five years. The second graph lists an overall earnings percentage for four different earnings periods. The final graphic shows how the company rates the level of risk. Investment Opportunity 2 also provided three documents to illustrate the fund’s risks and returns over the past five years. The first graph lists how a hypothetical investment of $10,000 fared over those five years. The second graph lists an overall earnings percentage for four different earnings periods. The final graphic shows how the company rates the level of risk. Both say the potential returns of each investment, but investment opportunity 1 hypothetical investment of $10,000 fared over those five years is not as steady as investment opportunity 2. Investment Opportunity 2 is the fraudulent one because its percentage of return is better than investment opportunity 1. Both are with large companies that are almost just alike but investment opportunity 2 has a better rates of return. The first one serves thousands of customers and specializes in managing stocks and mutual funds. The second firm serves thousands of customers, and it specializes in managing mutual funds that invest in bonds.
Explanation: Hope this helps this is what I used for <u>Edge 2020</u> ^-^. Also I do not take credit for this answer, but I feel like this is a very well and detailed answer.
Answer:
Appurtenant easement
Explanation:
An appurtenant easement grants the dominant tenement the right to use any adjoining property that transfers with the land through the servient tenement.
While the servient tenement provides the easement . the dominant tenement benefits the easement
In the scenario given , the lots are dominant tenement being the beneficiary of the right to use the land while the lake frontage is the servient tenement as it provides the easement for the lots
Answer:
Once expenses have been identified, they can be categorized as either fixed expenses or variable expenses.
For example, your mortgage would be considered a __fixed__ expense, because _the total amount does not vary_. Conversely, grocery bills would be considered _variable_, because the actual amount is _varies_.
Explanation:
Fixed expenses are fixed in total within a relevant range. The amount remains the same from one period to the next. The element of the fixed expense that changes is the cost per unit and not the total amount. On the other hand, variable expenses vary in total because of their quantities vary but their costs per unit remain fixed.
Answer:The marginal cost of fourth unit is $589
Explanation:The marginal cost of a good is defined as the cost of producing an additional one unit which increases the total cost of such good. Therefore we can say that;
Marginal cost=Total cost at 4 units - total cost at (4-1) units
=total cost of the 4 units - total cost of the three units
=3,087 -2,498
=$589
Also using the formulae;
Marginal cost = Change in cost / change in quantity
= 3,087 -2,498/4-3 =589/1= $589
The marginal cost of fourth unit is $589
