What? I don't get what this question is asking.
The following are reasons to conclude that Hamlet had not gone mad:
- He told Laertes that he had acted strangely because he was temporarily insane. Someone who was truly mad will not know this fact.
- He knowingly acted wildly when the King and Polonius arranged a meeting to observe him.
- He was also sane because he overheard something that Polonius said over the curtain and killed her for it.
The above three points are reasons to believe that Hamlet was not actually mad in the story.
He was simply acting up because he could still process the events that were happening around him.
Learn more about inferences here:
brainly.com/question/16750080
The answers is B, because as you see in the passage it explains various situations about a broad topic and the answer b is the most logical way to answer the question.
Answer:
In this speech Abraham Lincoln makes a good transition by explaining how many years ago , his people first came to this new continent forming a new nation filled up with liberty and the dedication to all men created equal. He then proceeds to explain that there is a civil war forming, and this will be the time for the nation to actually show their full potential. Abraham carries on by saying that even if our people try to show their full potential, our people who have already died for us or have been fighting for us ,have made our nation more stronger that there could ever be, and we should not take credit for it , but what we should do is to proceed to fight for what they have started and proceed to finish this fight to the dedication of brave men who have made this country a better place.
Explanation:
