Complete Question
The Brown's Ferry incident of 1975 focused national attention on the ever-present danger of fires breaking out in nuclear power plants. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has estimated that with present technology there will be on average, one fire for every 10 years for a reactor. Suppose that a certain state has two reactors on line in 2020 and they behave independently of one another. Assuming the incident of fires for individual reactors can be described by a Poisson distribution, what is the probability that by 2030 at least two fires will have occurred at these reactors?
Answer:
The value is 
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The rate at which fire breaks out every 10 years is
Generally the probability distribution function for Poisson distribution is mathematically represented as

Here x represent the number of state which is 2 i.e 
Generally the probability that by 2030 at least two fires will have occurred at these reactors is mathematically represented as

=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - [P(x_1 + x_2 = 0 ) + P( x_1 + x_2 = 1 )]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5BP%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%3D%200%20%29%20%2B%20P%28%20x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%3D%201%20%29%5D)
=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - [ P(x_1 = 0 , x_2 = 0 ) + P( x_1 = 0 , x_2 = 1 ) + P(x_1 , x_2 = 0)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5B%20P%28x_1%20%20%3D%200%20%2C%20%20x_2%20%3D%200%20%29%20%2B%20P%28%20x_1%20%3D%200%20%2C%20x_2%20%3D%201%20%29%20%2B%20P%28x_1%20%2C%20x_2%20%3D%200%29%5D)
=> 
=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - \{ [ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}]] )+ ( [ \frac{1^1}{1! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^1}{ 1! } * e^{-1}]] ) + ( [ \frac{1^1}{ 1! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}]]) \}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5C%7B%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E0%7D%7B%200%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%20%2A%20%5B%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E0%7D%7B%200%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5D%20%29%2B%20%28%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E1%7D%7B1%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%20%2A%20%5B%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E1%7D%7B%201%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5D%20%29%20%2B%20%28%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E1%7D%7B%201%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%20%2A%20%5B%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E0%7D%7B%200%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5D%29%20%5C%7D)
=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 )= 1- [[0.3678 * 0.3679] + [0.3678 * 0.3679] + [0.3678 * 0.3679] ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%3D%201-%20%5B%5B0.3678%20%20%2A%200.3679%5D%20%2B%20%5B0.3678%20%20%2A%200.3679%5D%20%2B%20%5B0.3678%20%20%2A%200.3679%5D%20%20%5D)

Answer:
This would be a decay function.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a function is a growth function that means that it is growing but a decay function means that it is getting smaller.
The answer is 13 hope this helps
Explanation:
To achive that you have to piant a ring in red, which will have its big diameter equal to the sphere diameter and its small diameter equal to the cube diagonal.
The diagonal of the cube can be calculated using Pithagoras:

Where D is the diagonal and L is the side of the cube